RACHEL, RACHEL, RACHEL, RACHEL.
I don't care how beautiful Fantassia is, and in a couple of years (if not sooner) NEITHER WILL YOU!
2007-01-04 18:36:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by F 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Well i think that you should marry rachel because she seems like a really nice per son while the other girl i think you woul;d have way too many problems with her. it's ok that she doesn't have many similar interest i mean your not suppose to be exactly the same cause that never works out it's good that you guys have different interest because one way you can make eachother happy is by trying new things. So i think your best bet would be her. but i do think that maybe you shouldn't be marrying yet at all. because if you need to ask others then there's a problem.
2007-01-05 14:57:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by boricuaangel196 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, this is a hard decision to make.
Rachel would seem to be more loyal and devoted to you for marriage. Rachel also lives far away, and long distance relationships can be rough.
But again, Fantassia is closer to you. She may flirt with alot of guys, but it's just flirting. Most people are like this. I doubt it will lead to anything bad.
This decision can't be made overnight. Opposites do attract and people with similar tastes work well together. The real question is this: Who do you see yourself with in 20 years?
If it was up to me, It would be Rachel.
This isn't a poll though. You are the one marrying her, not us. You have to make the final decision, whether you use the question or not. I can tell that you are not ready for marriage by a long shot if you use Yahoo Answers to help you decide on who you think your wife should be.
2007-01-05 02:54:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by pitsloth 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
If you had any business getting married to either one, you'd know which one to marry and wouldn't be asking.. It's not something anyone else can decide for you. And come on, so what if Fantassia is so beautiful? It doesn't sound like she treats you very good and if she treats you that way, what would she treat your children like? Rachel sounds like she is a nice person, but if distance is such an issue, why bring her up? Also, if you don't have any common interests, what are you going to do together for the next 50 years?
2007-01-05 12:47:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Trace 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
People who ask questions about others' opinions have their opinion but a weak one. They just need reinforcement from others. So what is your decision? Whom do you want us to conform?
Asking others may lead to confusion as people like me and others here would give opinion based on our experiences and perceptions. We also do not know 'YOU'.
So aks your heart first.
My preference will be Rachel ! Not having similar interests is not a problem. Anger is.
Rachel has patience. So see will handle the differences (if any arising out of different interests) better.
Marriage is making a full one out of two halfs. Differences in interests dont matter much. Yes but differences in values must not be ignored.
2007-01-05 03:17:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I sense you dont really want to marry either one, for very good reasons, but fear there isnt any other choices, or are in a hurry. Do not marry either one, at very least wait and try to work on one or the other, and let one go. If it doesnt work, go to an activity you enjoy, and try to find someone there that has good values and a common interest. Good luck my marriage minded friend.
2007-01-05 02:49:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Marriage is something you've got to work at to make it work.
Doesn't look as if anyone would get anywhere worthwhile with a girl like Fantassia who's obviously totally self-centered.
If Rachel and you are prepared to work at marriage there could be good mileage there.
2007-01-06 14:52:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by Feinschmecker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither! if u can find problems with them then they're not perfect for u to marry n it might not last as long.. if i was u id try find some1.. fantassia's flirting issue might not b so bad if u tlk to her about how u feel about her flirtin but i dnt think u should b wantin t marry some1 who has an anger issue.. rachel seems better but u wont b able to get on 4 ever if u dont like the same things! x
2007-01-05 07:20:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Rachel seems like a logical choice only because she is patient, which means she would probably take part in interests that you have and not complain about them.
2007-01-05 17:56:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by Bonzai Betty 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rachel. Clear cut case. Marry the good one.
2007-01-05 04:05:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's bad Karma to elevate one person over the other, but how would you choose a girl who "looks better," or "is hotter," who is also more treacherous? I would go with the loyalty. Just be sure to match that loyalty.
I've never been in a romantic relationship, but I can't imagine being picky over "common interests." The only way I would lose interest in a girl is if she attacks me with a knife, or something like that.
2007-01-05 02:46:08
·
answer #11
·
answered by perfectlybaked 7
·
2⤊
2⤋