English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Don't famous people have a right to some privacy ?

How would you feel if your every move was photographed and put out for all to see?

2007-01-04 17:15:48 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Media & Journalism

23 answers

I do believe the Paparazzi should have a limit on how they contact people because a lot of stars would gladly set up appointments for interviews with the Papparazzi. It's when they badger stars and catch them at awkward moments that they run into problems. No one wants to be constantly hounded by cameras even if they are famous. Everyone deserves some alone time with their families. On the flip side of things though the Paparazzi do bring a lot of attention to stars thus making them more and more popular. So it's just a matter of give and take and not going overboard just to get a photo shot.

2007-01-04 17:32:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

NO, I think they should all just disappear.

If you want to stop the paparazzi you have to remove the economics behind what they do, that means removing all the people who actually pay to see this crap.

Personally I would love not to hear squat about Hollywood and the useless ilk that crawl out of the place on a daily basis. I really don't need to know the last time Britney acted like a ****, wait that was 5 seconds ago.

Now there is a scoop if I ever heard one, wait i did yesterday and the day before and the say before that......

2007-01-04 18:17:21 · answer #2 · answered by Stone K 6 · 1 0

i think of that the paparazzi desires to leave alot of Celebs on my own. are you able to even think of? You walk out of your place, get in you automobile to get some Wendys or something. The day is largely a typical day, not something particular. You pull up, walk in, order to circulate (or maybe circulate in the process the window). You come back on your automobile and close the door whilst WHAM!!!! Paparazzi storms the automobile. Ligh Bulbs flashing, human beings hiking on the automobile, you have not have been given any the place to circulate. so which you enable them to take some %.. same element occurs the following day, and the subsequent, and the subsequent, and the subsequent..... What might you do? i will completely comprehend why some celebs turn off the digital camera, attempt to snatch the digital camera, punch the paparazzi, between different issues. i think of that Britney Spears and aloth of different Celebs elect a destroy from the paparazzi!!!!!

2016-10-30 01:18:12 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Surely it depends on what you are famous for? If you are famous for being famous, as in Paris Hilton ,then your job is to hog as much of the limelight as you can.
If you are an actor, painter, singer etc then THAT is your job. When you are working you should be open to public scrutiny; but you are entitled to have a private life as well.
Entitled to eat out, shop or play with your kids without people hounding you for photographs or autographs.
Why the heck do people feel the need to live their lives vicariously through those of celebrities?

2007-01-04 17:41:21 · answer #4 · answered by Christine H 7 · 3 0

The paparazzi are extremely rude and inconsiderate and their activities are illegal already because it is illegal to harass people. Famous people should have a right to privacy like anyone else.

The real problem is the majority who are stupid enough to buy the rubbish that the gossip mongers in the press peddle.

2007-01-04 19:48:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

If it wasn't for the Paparazzi, the famous wouldn't be famous and earning top bucks!
A sacrifice worth paying I've heard celebs say.

2007-01-04 17:21:50 · answer #6 · answered by SOL SIREN 2 · 2 0

u know as we learned in journalism we must to give the person some privacy, u know if the camera over u 24 hours u will not act normal so allot of famous people get divorce.

2007-01-04 21:22:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If they did not want attention, there are ways to avoid it. For example, giving away 95% of your money to the poor, wearing boring clothes, and living in a one-room apartment would most likely get photographers off your back. As long as you act sane, anyways. Also, being generally boring might help quite a bit.

2007-01-04 17:22:12 · answer #8 · answered by Mike A 2 · 3 0

Its unfair imo. There should be certain times that famous people allow themselves to be photographed... press shoots ect.

I'd be well pissed if they were hanging outside my home, following me around shopping, driving after me, telephoto lensing me whilst on holiday with family...... its gone way too far - but supply and demand... and its the demand from the public for their waterbrain magazines full of gossipy titbits which makes it how it is.

2007-01-04 17:25:12 · answer #9 · answered by Narky 5 · 2 0

Considering they get paid buckets of money & get loads of free swag that they can afford to buy, no, I don't think the paparazzi are that big of a deal. It's a trade off. Most of them want their pictures taken anyway. If they didn't, they would be in community theater or something.

2007-01-04 17:23:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers