And replaced them with yes men who agree with his point of view. Are we really supposed to believe that this is progress?
2007-01-04 16:22:39 · 14 answers · asked by truth be told 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
PC - you couldn't be more mistaken. Bush has mistakenly said that it is up to his generals to determine the troop levels. His generals said more troops would be a bad idea. And Bush repaid their candor by removing them from their posts.....
2007-01-04 16:32:46 · update #1
Alex PHD - you mean Democrats like Murtha? Yep, he's been CLAMORING for more troops. Great point...If only he had the sense to listen to McCain's calls for troop reductions. Please don't waste my time with your foolishness....
2007-01-04 17:21:31 · update #2
Actually, Its the Dems who proposed sending in more troops
2007-01-04 16:37:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
because of the fact extra troops (guy potential) might desire to help in looking, battling, and killing insurgents. We shouldve despatched extra troops some years in the past. we'd desire to attempt and end the interest and we'd desire to apply extra rigidity and tacticts to help squash nearly all of the insurgents. of direction, this may be for not something if Iraqis do not arise and do their area besides. We additionally might desire to some how get Iran to cease supporting the insurgents. extra sanctions in line with risk. that could be a clean direction. in case you expected a clean direction to be %. up and go away, then you fairly are incorrect. Even the Dems like that bag woman Pelosi suggested we'd desire to consistently have extra troops. She suggested that a mutually as lower back yet of direction now she is asserting no because of the fact as usual, the Dems prefer to be against something Bush is for. the guy cant win because of the fact because of the fact the commencing up of this, people have been turn flopping and purely proceed to attack him, yet the place are there solutions or decision concepts? They dont grant any. The democrats are proving to be sturdy for not something.
2016-12-15 16:04:38 · answer #2 · answered by allateef 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just like he fired Richard A. Clark, Bush's senior counter-terrorism adviser, when Clark warned of an attack like the one that happened on 9/11. It wasn't what Bush wanted to hear.
Colin Powell didn't get fired, though. He finally resigned because he would no longer lie for Bush like he was ordered to do at the United Nations. Condi has no such problem with integrity when it comes to pushing Bush's agenda.
The only Bush survivors are those who agree with his viewpoint, the perenial "yes-men" (and women).
2007-01-04 16:47:09 · answer #3 · answered by Don P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush hopes we will He forgets that you can only fool some of the people some of the time and none of the people all of the time Which is exactly what he has been trying to do ever since he 1st took office
2007-01-04 16:27:48 · answer #4 · answered by bisquedog 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
this is not by any means the first time it has happened. I don't imagine it will be the last time either. after all, you are either with Bush or against him. and you express a different opinion that his, you are against him and gone. so much for having advisers.
2007-01-04 16:39:58 · answer #5 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I DONT AGREE WITH ANY OF IT! Im so sick of the deployments! my husband and I have been together 5 yrs and three of them he has been deployed and he is deployed once again. My cousin is about to head over there, and Feb 2006 one of my cousins was killed. Yes I know its their jobs, but if u sit down and actually talk to the soldiers they will tell u that they do not want to go back over because they dont know what their fighting for.
2007-01-04 16:27:33 · answer #6 · answered by Proud Army Wife and Mommy 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
ahem.. Colin Powell... Richard Clark... all those retired generals... and it goes on and on...
this is just yet another incident ... same story, different people...
"tell me why I'm right, no matter if I'm wrong or right" seems to be the mantra of this administration...
"and if I do something wrong, I'll blame it on you and fire you... even though you didn't want to do it in the first place"
brownie... ashcroft...
2007-01-04 16:29:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, you really are supposed to believe that. But it sounds that you are smarter than Bush believes
2007-01-04 16:25:08 · answer #8 · answered by Ferret 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Hell yes. They are soldiers that report to the commander in chief. If they dont want to do or support what the boss says...They need to get gone.
If I were president I'd bust them down to 2nd LT
2007-01-04 16:25:23 · answer #9 · answered by P C 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
This is his "new way forward in Iraq." Fire those who disagree with him.
2007-01-04 16:27:55 · answer #10 · answered by murphy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋