read the full article please.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070105/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq
2007-01-04 16:06:58 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
His generals don't agree with him anymore so he'll just replace them with yes men. Bush has to be the most damaging president to this country ever...
2007-01-04 16:15:03 · answer #1 · answered by kberto 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
First of all, there is no such thing as having "Bush" and "help Iraq" in the same sentence. He wants to increase the military by 20-40,000 men--just for Iraq, even though he has been advised not to. How the hell is increasing the military going to "sustain and govern" Iraq and help it establish itself on its own feet?!?!?!?! What is the point in increasing the military and forcing them to continue to fight in Iraq if no progress (save the fact that 16,000 soldiers have been killed .. I beleive) has been accomplished?!?!?!? The point is, he does not take orders. HE is the one in control, our PRESIDENT, whoever elected him was high on crack!!!!! I am telling you, the democratic party HATES his guts and just has to go along with the whole thing because he is the "commander in chief" as one representitive put it (last night on ABC World News Now). He will not take no for an answer, so replacing his chiefs is what makes him feel that he is on the right path to becoming an OIL KING.
AGHHHHHHH Bush is a whack job!
2007-01-05 14:30:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Almost anything different at this point couldn't be any worse. I sincerely hope not, anyway. Sometimes I think Bush has been consulting Reagan's astrologer and a Ouijia board in determining the course in Iraq.........
2007-01-05 00:23:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i am not democrat but anti-republican at this point. in all honesty i think it is purposeless to have bush in power now that democrats are going to take over. i also feel the killing of Saddam was a mistake and they went through with it because to the bush family is personal and they had to kill him before the "new" congress members came in and took action against it. the war in Iraq isn't because of nuclear power, its because of oil and if people had one functioning braincell they would realize it.
2007-01-05 13:06:39 · answer #4 · answered by Jessica 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That is just Bush polishing his prized turd.
2007-01-05 02:46:58 · answer #5 · answered by aorton27 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he is getting desparate.
2007-01-05 22:47:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋