2007-01-04 15:03:23 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference ➔ Primary & Secondary Education
yes, they even lets use actual art studios. Also we used the real art products, not the cheap stuff. We had ceramics 1-3, painting 1-2, 3-d design, drawling 1-2, photography 1-2. they also has this advance class that only certain people could take, I was luck enough to get into the independent program. I took them all but photography.
2007-01-08 03:16:07 · answer #1 · answered by Monet 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The art program in my high school was not particularly impressive. I suppose it was the main art teacher. When I was younger, most art classes did not focus on basic painting or drawing skills. Mostly we worked with easy to do crafts or clay work.
In high school, the art teacher seemed impatient with those students who were not that good at drawing or painting, even though most of the students were not taught this in their earlier years. My high school was small and this particular teacher was it for the art program. If your work did not represent what he thought were good art subjects (Cowboys and Indians type stuff), he wasn't to receptive.
2007-01-04 23:20:49 · answer #2 · answered by alderstat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was excellent but I'm 40 and we actually had art programs and art teachers back then..
2007-01-04 23:13:11 · answer #3 · answered by Nox E 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
awesome. i have a minor in art history, Chinese art, will go with my major
2007-01-04 23:11:06 · answer #4 · answered by Wicked 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not very good
they dont put that much effort in it and it sucks
i am stuck with high level boring academic jargon
2007-01-04 23:10:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋