2007-01-04 14:52:52 · 25 answers · asked by The Father of All Neocons 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
He should have been confined to a pen of wild, hungry boars, just so he'd know in advance what would happen to his body.
2007-01-08 08:20:06 · answer #1 · answered by Like, Uh, Ya Know? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably. He ordered the beheading so many countless people that maybe he should have gotten some comeuppance for that. Saddam Hussein wanted to be shot by a firing squad, not hanged. The reason was that he fancied himself a military leader and felt that it would be the proper way to execute him.
2007-01-04 23:58:53 · answer #2 · answered by Jenny A_331 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No suffering that we could inflict upon Saddam could have ever equalized the misery that he inflicted on the Iraqi people and the world. His hanging was a humane, swift, and nearly instantaneous death. Even if he was jeered and shouted at during his last moments on Earth, it is still far better than any fate he deserved.
2007-01-04 22:58:41 · answer #3 · answered by rj7123 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think beheading would have been more humane as it's a rather quick process. WHAT should have happened concerning his execution is this: NO videotaping, nobody taunting him. I recognize that he's caused a lot of pain, but it just wasn't right the way his death was handled!
2007-01-04 22:55:10 · answer #4 · answered by octoberleigh 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, i like the hanging because he had a slight chance of his neck not breaking right away, and suffocating. I'm kinda mad that didn't happen, damn. But seriously i think that man should have had an even worse death, like possibly castrating him, or cutting off his limbs, also i read something earlier about cuts and salt. I like that one too.
2007-01-04 23:01:45 · answer #5 · answered by emily 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Doesn't matter to me "the how"- just that it is done.
I would have been fine with a sedative that put him away forever.
He would have no recollection of any pain we could give him- so that is why I don't care.
2007-01-04 22:55:44 · answer #6 · answered by Mommyk232 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Feeding him to a wood chipper, feet first. It was his favorite method of execution for 30 years. It's only fitting he get a taste of it.
2007-01-05 02:34:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not into torture, but in his case I say douse him in gasoline and light a match.
Or bind his hands together and release him to an angry mob of people.
2007-01-04 23:19:02 · answer #8 · answered by Joe 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think either would accomplish the desired result, and his actions displayed he lost his head a long time ago anyway.
2007-01-04 23:14:19 · answer #9 · answered by Sage 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should have given him the same treatment he gave out. He is dead and not coming back. Let's give it a rest, he doesn't deserve our time.
2007-01-04 23:20:45 · answer #10 · answered by lucysmom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋