THERE IS NO PROOF! Same goes for Afghanistan.
When will they learn that what we do in Iraq does not help us on a defensive level, and the way things are going it is not even helping us on an offensive level. As we all know, the 109th Congress didn't care at all about defense spending, they only cared about deficit spending for our two detrimental wars.
I will ask again, what proof do they have that there was an attack against the USA which failed since the war began?
The wars are NOT making us safer. The wars are only succeeding in increasing the amount of terrorism worldwide.
And yeah, it's nice that Saddam was killed but what about the ruthless dictators in MANY other middle eastern countries? Or North Korea?
2007-01-04 13:58:37 · 9 answers · asked by Imprudent 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Of course republicans can't answer the question. It's because they know I am absolutely right. They wouldn't admit it though...
2007-01-04 14:03:40 · update #1
JUST ADMIT THE FACTS! YOU HAVE NO PROOF!!!!
2007-01-04 14:09:36 · update #2
Eddie, you have no proof of that either. Dang, republicans are so petty tonight (as always).
2007-01-04 14:14:49 · update #3
aw come on can't you come up with a NEW question...
2007-01-04 14:02:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Ask **** Cheney. lol Drew Blood lower than, because the attacks were blamed on Osama Bin encumbered who change into residing in Afghanistan and considering Iraq had not something to do with 9/11 so it took a strong even as longer for them to go back up with the bullshit tale mandatory to cajole individuals and the global that invading Iraq change right into a ought to as a thanks to keep the global a non violent position. i wager it truly is why the wars are over and terrorism is destroyed very nearly seven years later huh? i wager it truly is the reason Osama Bin encumbered and his crew were apprenhended and are at the moment on lack of life row searching ahead to execution sure?
2016-12-01 20:30:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Al Quiada is in Iraq.Radical Muslims are in Iraq. Saddam was given 17 chances to allow UN weapons inspections. This is the same kind of crap that people were saying before we entered WWII . We tried to stay out . Even when Hitler invaded France. We eventually got attacked because the evil (that still exists ) in the world saw our non action as weakness. Saddam brought it on himself. No logic i give you will sway you .Because Liberals do not use logic they use their bleeding hearts.
2007-01-04 14:05:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Terrorism has risen 300% world wide since Bush invaded Iraq. When i think of republicans and national security my mind wonders to border security and how incredibly pathetic of a job Bush has done on that front since 9/11. I think of the 9/11 commission that Bush hand picked, and how they gave him a D grade on security. And then I think of how fooled the American public is into believing the GOP lie that there better on national security then the dems, and I shake my head and laugh.
2007-01-04 14:27:50 · answer #4 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were expensive that coffers of the state were depleted for purposes of anti-terrorism. However, the threat were not real as no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq and the terrorists in Afghanistan were already dismantled.
2007-01-04 14:05:26 · answer #5 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
What will you say if were hit again? That Bill's policies were more effective?
It gives me no pleasure to say this, but you're asking to be a victim
2007-01-04 14:10:50 · answer #6 · answered by Archaic Aperture 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am an expert in the middle east. 95% of Iraqis cannot even read.
2007-01-04 14:01:32 · answer #7 · answered by George Noory 1 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Proof? You're not dead. (so maybe it wasn't such a good idea after all)
2007-01-04 14:03:40 · answer #8 · answered by richarddelightful 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
go away little one
2007-01-04 14:03:24 · answer #9 · answered by Mr Bellows 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋