"Society" is an abstraction--there really is no such thing. There are only individuals living together. Therefore, society does not have any responsibility. The individuals who make up the society are responsible for providing for themselves and their dependents, for refraining from interference in the private spheres of their fellow citizens, and for participating in self-government. As a citizen, one bears no responsibility for the welfare of one's fellow citizens. As a moral person, however, one does bear responsibility to assist those who need assistance. This is not a legal obligation, and it ought not to be coerced; if it is not voluntary, it is not charity, and if it is not charity, it is irresponsible.
2007-01-04 14:18:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by sargon 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly... i think of you're making generalizations approximately matters that are plenty extra complicated. working example, *some* instructors do dazzling paintings and do be sure their teenagers can examine and could notify the mum and dad if their baby remains falling at the back of. different instructors are merely scraping throughout the day, no longer likely worrying. And *some* mum and dad will do their section via choosing up slack at homestead, whilst others do merely no longer, or won't. now and lower back the textile extremely is strange and the training are not sparkling. now and lower back we've undesirable days, even undesirable years, and all and sundry around us finally ends up having to shield that. yet confident, i think of shirking very own duty is a great undertaking, a marginally demanding one. yet some sectors of society do extra useful than others. on the subject rely of a individual no longer with the flexibility to get into ANY college, now and lower back the way society is set up extremely is in charge. while a baby grows up in a quite disfunctional homestead and falls throughout the cracks and fails, he remains a baby. He won't be in a position to be envisioned to be triumphant, or he's very hot if he does. He nevertheless CAN bypass to varsity, yet he will probable bypass while he's matured slightly, gotten older and wiser, long gone back and amassed the products of his existence and gotten on with issues. See what I imply via it is stressful to generalize? distinctive human beings all act and react differenly to comparable circumstances. the secret's, it is nevertheless as much as the guy to make something from their lives - with or with out the help of society. If a individual is prepared it is practicable. some will do it swifter, some slower, yet we are in a position to all take duty. So, confident, I agree, yet with some attention for information how perplexing it is now and lower back. desire i've got no longer been too puzzling! aside: yet another undertaking to gasoline the fireplace is that western societies do no longer place plenty emphasis on the skill of severe thinking. how are you able to're making stable possibilities in case you have on no account heard of exploring each and every of the ideas and evaluating them? we are bombarded with each and every of the solutions to existence's issues, yet we infrequently think of to question those solutions... Oof, that makes me experience gloomy.
2016-10-06 11:05:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Society has a responsibility to leave me alone.
“An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens.”
Thomas Jefferson
.
2007-01-04 13:25:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Zak 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Society has no social responsibility.
One man has no inborn obligation to help those less fortunate.
He is able to choose to do so and not be forced to do so.
2007-01-04 13:04:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ginger P 2
·
2⤊
0⤋