Why are republicans so pessimistic about our new congress?

Question

It has the rekindled potential for bipartisanship! Are liberals and democrats the only ones who feel this is a good thing? There was an absence of bipartisanship for the past 6 years. Bipartisanship is a good thing, whether someone wants to believe it or not. I believe they already miss the days when democrats had virtually no voice in Congress. Well, those days are gone and the worst is behind us.

How_would_I_know, republicans and democrats already said all too often that they are willing to work together. As far as the democratic plans, look no further than their 100-hour plan. It is simply astonishing to see all the great things they plan to accomplish.

Yep, just as I thought. Republicans have blind-pessimism even displayed when they answer this question.

With the razor-thin majority lead by Democrats, bipartisanship is unavoidable! It will happen, and it is impossible for it to not happen. That should be obvious that both parties will have a say in what will happen.

Sorry that you are so gullible Mark J, but democrats never came to the consensus of an "immediate" withdrawl, they never decided to cut funds, and they are forced to allow republicans to review laws before they are even signed into law by our president. Turn off Faux News, ok?

Answer 1

Republicans are pessimistic about the new Congress because the Democrats are in control as the majority. Anyway, it is good for the US because the President is a Republican. Check and balance between the Executive and Legislative Departments is good.

Answer 2

I agree with your assessment. And I think there are a number of PRepublicans who would agree.

But remember that for the last 12 years, the GOP has controlled Congress--and in the last few years they have made it clear that they do not care to engage in the give-and-take of bipartisanship. Many of the Republicans in Congress still have this "my way or the highway" mentality. For that sort, the loss of some of their power--power that is likely to be eroded further in 2008--is their primary concern.

That sounds harsh--but it is also true. Bipartisanship is indeed a good thing for our country--but those (fortunately, by no means all Republicans are guilty of this) who have rejected that approach in recent years, by the same token, have shown that the best interests of our country are not their primary concern.

Somebody is going to say "but what about the Democrats?" The answer is simple--for their to be real bipartisanship, the party in power has to be willing--and have the power not to do so. Which is what th eGOP chose to do in recent years. The Democrats now have the power--and although some in the GOP may still refuse to co-operate, some will. But the ball is in the Democrats court now. They will have--and push--their own agenda, which is fine. Will they have a real spirit of bipartisanship? That remains to be seen.

Addendum: Also, some in the GOP may be afraid they will be treated the way they treated the Democrats!

And to "markJ"--the Democrats did not promise an immediate withdrawal from Iraq--and don't have the power to do that anyway. That mess is still Bush's problem. LOL

Answer 3

Well, how do you feel about the democrats breaking their promise to you about an immediate withdrawal of our troops? Now they are talking about just cutting military spending so the surge will be less than 30,000 troops more in Iraq. Looks like they broke that promise. How do you feel about that? They talk about bipartisanship but democrats are not going to allow republicans to participate in their first one hundred days of bills they want signed into effect, such as stem cell research and others. They may be the majority, but only by like 40 seats. Looks like they are still going by their cut and run strategy they are well known for. Sounds like they fooled all those voters out there just so they could regain the majority. Now Liberals and anti war protesters are mad about that. Nothing pleases you Libs. You're just a bunch of suckers. Republicans will be back in office before you know it, that I'm not worried about.

BTW- I've never heard of Faux News. I'm at work all day, My access to the news comes from MSN. From the last time I checked, it was quite legitimate. But only time will tell , for the Democrats. To me, they still stick by their cut and run strategies.

Answer 4

With the current politicians we have in office, there will not be any bi-partisanship. Dems and the Repubs are not the same 25 plus years ago. Work for the common good? Don't think so. That is why the previous Repub majority didn't work and thats why this Dem majority won't work either. They are too split. If they can come together, it will take new voices.

Answer 5

Temp transformations? confident. i wish the dems lose massive time. in the journey that they lose and commence having to easily compromise and make judgements that are for the strong of all of us, then we'd want to be able to commence doing something of fee. shall we commence by droping earnings tax in 0.5 and making it a tax on products and a carbon tax. the overall result to us might want to be nil for the common customer, yet shall we significantly replace the route of the country. imagine in case you'll, taxing recycled fabric at a decrease fee. How a lot might want to that improve recycling? imagine a carbon tax that doesn't hit the middle type wallet? How cool might want to that be? it would want to be fullyyt market pushed, with the governmentto furnish a accepted route. previous that, we are porbably no more suitable than 2 a lengthy time period faraway from having e-automobiles take over the market. With slightly push form the governmentin a carbon tax (with linked relief of earnings tax connected to the bill) it would want to take position in 10-15 years. slightly push for nuclear skill, that you already know the conservatives might want to be behind, and we'd want to be able to dethrone Coal as king. the direction to regulate, inspite of the indisputable fact that, must be an wise bypass, brought on by rational decision making. not the scare all of us to lack of life or the deny there is even a topic as considered contained in the partisan politics that were happening.

Answer 6

The liberals have 100 hours and the clock is ticking. Does "bipartisanship" mean the "majority" does not allow the "minority" to put in their two cents worth, because that is all that has happened today on C-SPAN.

Answer 7

Where was the liberal/democrat will for bipartisanships the last 6 years? Why should you expect anything from us when you guys didn't give us jack?

Answer 8

Simple. They are not the majority. They should have rolled over the Democrats the past few years when they had the chance.

Answer 9

Many republicans are happy about the possibility of true bipartisanship within Congress, and I can't say I disagree with them. The radical ultra-right koolaid-drinking Republicans are pissy because now they can't just shove legislation down the country's throat at their own whim. They no longer can act as Bush's rubber stamp, and that threatens their power.

Answer 10

Because, They as I remember the '60s and 70's ..shudder