The Islamofacist dictator who wants to kill Jews, and ANNOUNCED it publicly? The evil psycho that declared that the Holocaust never happened and says he INTENDS to bring it about? The anti-freedom douchebag who believes that he needs to nuke Israel and the USA to fulfill Allah's will??
2007-01-04 09:12:10 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
One thing about these lunatic genocidal dictators, they are at least honest. They keep their campaign promises.
What scares me about having Dumbocrats in charge is that they think all these dictator guys take their promises as lightly as they, the Dumbocrats, do. That is why the Dems can try to come to an "understanding" with someone who wants to kill all of us, and has said so on many occasions.
When Ahmadijibberish says he wants us all dead, he means it. Will it take a nuke going off over here somewhere to get people to wake up?
2007-01-04 10:26:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
When you talk about a subject that you know nothing about you show the world how stupid you really are.
1. Ahmadinejad is not a dictator, he is an elected president.
2. He has no more power to decalre/start a war than the mayor of los angeles does. The real power in Iran is Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, he is the "supreme" leader and he's the one who makes the real decisions. He's been in power for years (he's the real dictator) and is more interested in maintaining the regime than starting wars.
3. He's not really the first person, or the only person, or the last person who wants to kill a whole group of people.
4. Everything he says is to appeal to his party just like the stuff Bush tells his party to appease them.
5. Iran has not initiated a war with anyone in hundreds of years and did not take part in the earlier wars between the arabs and the jews... there's no history of aggression unless you go back thousands of years. (you can't say that about many countries nowadays)
6. Even if Iran had the bomb they would use it like the North Koreans do, as a leverage tool to get stuff... It is extremely improbable that they would use it.
7. Currently they have a lot of allies in Asia, they would lose all their allies and support if they acted on anything.
8. Nazi Germany had equal to better odds with technology and industry. Iran neither has the technology nor the man power.
Work on honing your skills and knowledge... a keen mind can tell the difference between political rhetoric/posturing and a real threat.
2007-01-04 17:30:49 · answer #2 · answered by Jim Z 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Excellent comparison ... also remember that Hitler's regime had a very powerful influence in the Middle East during WWII, and many policies and ideals that the Third Reich followed were carried over to those nations that are still in effect to this day.
2007-01-04 17:24:45 · answer #3 · answered by icehoundxx 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
He is talking tough but so far hasn't done anything to Jews. His words are unacceptable because he is a leader of a country. Civilians, jews and muslim alike are always calling for each other's destruction- but leaders cannot afford that language.
Iranians are persecuting the Baha'is in real time though. Look into what they are doing to them! It has been going on for decades.
2007-01-04 17:20:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The difference between Hitler and Ahamdiejad (Haman):
Hitler went on a campaign to kill all the Jews, then worked on building a nuclear bomb.
Ahamdinejad is building a nuclear bomb first, then planning on killing all the Jews.
2007-01-04 23:31:22 · answer #5 · answered by mo mosh 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ahmadinejad is similar to Hitler, but an even more striking similarity is Kim Jong Il to Stalin.
2007-01-04 17:21:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely. The situation is identical. There is a crazy man running around saying he is going to take over. The civilized world buries its head in the sand hoping it will go away. Hitler did the same thing before he went on a rampage through Europe.
This situation shows that the only way to deal with killers is to kill them. You could also use "Chainsaw's Guide to Diplomacy" and have a pow wow with Iran. Here is how it goes: I sit at the table with my US people with Iran and Syria. I tell Iran that I want to them to stop developing nukes. He says no. I say hope you packed as we bomb Tehran to a beach. Then I turn to Asad from Syria and ask him if he will stop harboring Hezbollah and murdering Christians in Lebanon. He amazingly says yes. Geez, I wonder why?
2007-01-04 17:22:39 · answer #7 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
The difference is that he doesn't have the capability to do it. It'll be interesting to see what happens over the next 6 months, especially now that his party was voted out of power.
2007-01-04 17:15:51 · answer #8 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Finally, a voice of reason in the wilderness that is Yahoo Answers. Thank you Sir for your insight. Be prepared for the Libs to bash away at you, but you have surely written that which is TRUE! BRAVO!!
2007-01-04 17:19:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Good observation. Libs don't seem concerned about the real re-incarnation of Hitler in Iran. Instead they spend their energy slandering the President with asinine comparisons of himself and Hitler.
2007-01-04 17:19:24 · answer #10 · answered by C = JD 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋