i dont think that he should have been executed. r we forgetting that the usa was the country that armed him to kill those several people? the usa used him to his wits, but then he realized so he took revenge. if saddam got executed then i think bush should too. by the way did he appologize before dying?
2007-01-04 08:39:12 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
the people who r going for bush r seriously insane. i do accept that saddam wasnt a nice guy. i dont want to say anything bad about someone dead. i still go against the execution. and bush is a big fat baby!! thats just my opinion...and a million billion others. he was a drunky bfore he was pres.the only reason he got elected bcuz his father spoiled him and let him come in the easy way.
2007-01-04 10:15:10 · update #1
No. Why would he apologize killing people during a war. That is what u do in a war. they were his enemies, why would he apologize to them. I'm also against his hanging, it was a barbaric act, and it's not helping the situation in Iraq.and now they plan to hang an advocate of Saddam and also the judge who sentenced saddam, for making the wrong decision. But isn't that what Bush wanted? I totally agree with what ur saying, Saddam was indeed an ally, and so were the Al-Queda during the Afghan-Russian war.
2007-01-04 08:54:55 · answer #1 · answered by nashpaty 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I've got my written apology....didn't you get yours? LOL! He never apologized.That monster not only took his people out he took our people out too...Bush shouldn't get executed because if it wasn't because of his determination for our soldiers to stay over in the Gulf...Saddam would be alive today, getting away with his crimes against humanity. Saddam is gone...bin Laden is next. America is arming the troops over there to find a peaceful solution for what the insurgents are doing. There was a time when those people had beautiful cities. What went wrong over time should be the focus for the solution to end the war. Right now neither side is winning.
2007-01-04 09:24:11 · answer #2 · answered by Fascade 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Another liberal CHILD branwashed by the Communist News Network. @@ No, he did not apologize. He gassed thousands of women and children, and to the end said it was justified. He was an animal, and an apostate of hell. For you to grovel and think he was somehow mistreated only shows you are sadly lacking in knowledge of the brutalities of dictators. Think of how those children felt, vomiting and gagging, as they gasped their last excruciating breaths out on the dirty soil of a land cowering beneath his dictatorship. Bleeding heart loser. I hope he repented before he died, a least in his heart, but from what I saw, it seems he was not the least bit sorry.....Putting Saddam and Bush on the same turf is something only a moral retard would do.
2007-01-04 09:03:02 · answer #3 · answered by Rebecca C 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Sure!...Bad USA made him do all the torturing and executions. Heaven forbids that Saddam should be responsible for HIS own actions!.
Get a damn clue.
2007-01-04 11:00:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
HELLO!
No! He did not think he was guilty of anything. So why would he apologize. I kind of agree with some of what you said. I don't believe man should take another man's life except in self defense. I believe that President Bush is doing the best he can. I don't think any other President would have made any other decision. The execution was not his decision.
2007-01-04 08:53:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Nobody supplied chemical weapons to Saddam, he supplied himslef and he was testing them on his people. He was only hung for 160 so peoples death but was responsible for 1000s upon thousands of peoples death.
Even Bin Laden was going to fight Saddam 15 years ago but instead USA was given permission to go in after him back in '91.
Bush did not supply weapons ever, it was Reagan who supplied weapons to Iraq in the Iraq-Iran war.
Get your facts straight before you start ranting and raving. Or you'll get your mouth shut by someone like me.
2007-01-04 09:34:50 · answer #6 · answered by tenacious_d2008 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Saddam was a brutal, egotistical dictator who ruled by putting fear in the hearts of his countrymen/women. He put to death/tortured anyone who would dare to disagree w/him.
According to the media, he did NOT show any remorse for his brutal killings! It is much better for the Iraqis that he is gone! However, those ppl who recorded his hanging on a pic phone & put it on the internet were totally wrong & are being sought for punishment.
2007-01-04 08:52:07 · answer #7 · answered by Sheryl R 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No he didn't. And just because the US gave him the weapons, if it was known what he was going to do with them, it would have been different. And Bush wasn't in office when this happened, it was almost 20 years ago. You have a very skewed view of reality.
2007-01-04 08:44:38 · answer #8 · answered by Joe S 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no. he was also executed before he could be tried for crimes against humanity. good thing for papa bush since the evidence he might have brought up could have done real damage to alot of republican administrations.
DEAD MAN TELL NO TALES!!!
2007-01-04 08:52:37 · answer #9 · answered by jj raider 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Several people??? When did hundreds of thousands of people become only several? He didn't apologize, he was too angry at everyone for taking his control away. The only control he had left was to NOT apologize.
2007-01-04 11:02:04 · answer #10 · answered by ksgirl 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋