Why?
Given that they ahve been (they are "the" responsable of) killing people, why they are not supposed to be judged to death penalty?
"Because they're in the 'good' side". Which one is the good one?
The one which lies in order to get oil almost for free? In order to stablish a liberal government in the Middle East to extract its richness, feeding the USA and Europeans financial coorporations?
The one which makes war in the name of "our Lord, God"?
The one which lies during the electoral time, as shown already?
Why, I repeat, why p. Tony Blair and G. W. Bush should not be judged as well as was S. Hussein?
Have a good time!
Ie - young man, 24
2007-01-04 08:26:31 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
This is a really good question. I am afraid that in future both dudes will be "judged" by the public as their stupidity and arrogance become more and more recognized. If then history judges them as what they are, maybe we will never be so stupid and arrogant again...but maybe we will.
2007-01-04 08:35:32 · answer #1 · answered by kellenraid 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The good and the bad side it's not a game man. I am in no way defending the way they have gone about the troubles and the way Blair follows Bush makes me feel sick but I do not think they are as bad as Hussein was. I do not understand are you pro Hussein and his ex-dictatorship or just anti-west?
2007-01-04 09:08:27 · answer #2 · answered by Jabulani. 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam Hussein was just a small fish. George Bush and Tony Blair are big fish. Until even bigger fish come along or B & B are downsized, they're safe from judgement.
2007-01-04 08:40:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
bliar will walk free and the new president will block any investigations into dubya's goings on just like he did for clinton , he will be pardoned, there all in on it together . they are puppets of the global elite and nothing more, what is mistaken for incompetence in these to idiots ( that knowone agree with except there inner circles) is just the oposite everything planned is going in place , total surveilance grid big brother ,total police state , total control and all this will be in place in years rather than decades . REMEMBER this when we have a cashless society that is when they will have total control. click on this link http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-5948263607579389947&q=terrorstorm its a docu/film about how and why and very profesionally done.
2007-01-04 09:11:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why stupid liberals ask questions that hardly intelligable?
Look... Saddam was tried and convicted of MILLIONS of murders by his countrymen. I certainly don't see George Bush going out and commiting genocide. I don't see George Bush killing, imprisoning, toruturing for the slightest murmer against the government. I don't see George Bush laughing as people are stuck through tree-shredders... Feet first!
THINK about these things before you ask such idiotic questions!
2007-01-04 08:44:44 · answer #5 · answered by Firestorm 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Have you not been reading anything in here? Do you have any idea how many unenlightened, ignorant people have already asked this question? Move on. Sadaam is dead and so is Elvis. Think about something else for awhile.
2007-01-04 08:42:31 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's the winners who get to write history, not the losers.
2007-01-04 10:12:18 · answer #7 · answered by Máirtín 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is just a guess, but I would say that English is not your first language.
2007-01-04 09:07:53 · answer #8 · answered by cornbread 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
thats like comparing John Kerry with Hitler. two different categories cannot be compared
2007-01-04 08:44:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're an idiot, Saddam was tried and convicted to death, by his own country peers and justice system. He was convicted of ordering and participating in those killings also.
2007-01-04 08:33:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋