English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

It would seem to be the historical choice of last recourse, wouldn't it?
Once every single, selfish, self interest is exhausted, nations find a way to talk and work it out in each other's best interests....

2007-01-04 08:08:39 · answer #1 · answered by JC 7 · 0 0

Im sorry to say that the best 3 characters who could've answered that question are know a page in history. 1. Napolean 2. Gandhi 3....you figure out who's the third one!

2007-01-12 10:59:15 · answer #2 · answered by Bond 1 · 0 0

As far as what I've seen, there is always an alternative to behaving wisely.

2007-01-04 16:08:55 · answer #3 · answered by funnygrrl19 6 · 0 0

I have never seen any nation or man that exhausted all alternatives

2007-01-12 09:44:46 · answer #4 · answered by walkinandrockin 3 · 0 0

Sweet

2007-01-12 15:39:50 · answer #5 · answered by Gary 2 · 0 0

I think people start acting wisely only if they are forced to by military force or they realize it is in their self-interest to do that. Once their self-interest is in danger, people start considering other options than the status quo.

2007-01-04 16:26:17 · answer #6 · answered by KatGuy 7 · 0 0

No. History has taught us that after all else fails it is time for war.

2007-01-04 16:09:53 · answer #7 · answered by Eva 5 · 0 0

Yes, but history also teaches us that the other alternatives are infinite and inexhaustible.

2007-01-06 03:24:36 · answer #8 · answered by bubbacornflakes 5 · 0 0

American History yes.

2007-01-04 16:09:37 · answer #9 · answered by Yahoo! Yamster 1 · 0 0

To a point,but in the end things always go back to the way they were before.

2007-01-04 16:10:01 · answer #10 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers