Way too late
WTF ever happened to small government and fiscal restraint?
2007-01-04 08:12:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
hear, we are all hoping for the suited, with our new President. GWB wasn't the suited President, yet in the aftermath would have been the suited President after 9/11. he's single-minded yet no longer almost as a 'stupid' as critics will lead you to have self assurance. the rustic prospered, till final 12 months. you may't take care of Katrina's reaction -- no you will. Michael Moore skewered GWB over 5 years in the past, and we actually had no bonafide great Candidate for the White homestead over the final 2 years.. we've a historic previous/regulation lecturer now, that grew to become into in college after he grew to become into 29 YEARS old. upload yet another 11 yrs as a lecturer, and picture that GWB had actual extra experience, by skill of lots, that our present day President -- as stunning as that sounds, to you. in actuality, the Dems would have run a extra constructive determination then the stupid JFKerry and overwhelmed the very susceptible and susceptible GW Bush, 4 years in the past... so, who're you BLAMING? he's your President for yet another 2 weeks. You stand at the back of your leaders, criticize purposefully in case you like, yet renowned the burden & pressures on the workplace.. or you're no longer an American. Even under the embarassment of Bubba (who by skill of ways, in no way got here to NYC after the 'ninety 3 worldwide commerce midsection assaults, and FREED killer/terrorists in the FALN bombers, too, to no longer point out for the pay-for-play pardon of Saddam's black industry moneyman, Marc prosperous).
2016-10-30 00:15:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some people believe everything they hear. I had a bet with one of my friends, that I could post proof that Bush acknowledged that Saddam had nothing to do with the Trade Center bombings, and there would still be people on there telling me I was full of it. I posted quotes from Bush, and still there were people telling me that Saddam paid to bomb the WTC.
2007-01-04 08:09:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Which was in a UNANIMOUSLY passed bill.
Don't you think this will be targeted toward people who are engaging in terror activity? The government does not have the time nor the resources to open up everyone's mail.
2007-01-04 08:16:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by MoltarRocks 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Maybe when they realize that he has trampled all over our civil rights?
His newest mail-reading business is a ridiculous invasion of our privacy.
2007-01-04 08:11:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by C 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Conservatives have always wanted to dispose of the Bill of Rights.
Bush wants to dispose of the Bill of Rights.
Right you are,though. That doesn't mean he's a real conservative. He's no idealogue at all.
2007-01-04 08:11:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by £º$∑® 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
all u.s. mail ?! wow, i guess he doesn't have anything else to do except read your mail....its like the listening to phone calls do you really think the government will be interested in your grandma's bladder control problem? they will only be interested in suspected terrorists. also don't put this all on bush, your democrat run congress voted for it.
2007-01-04 08:09:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by ?! 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
I've always wondered that, he's expanded government and ran up the deficit. Definitley NOT a conservative.
2007-01-04 08:07:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Reading "Suspected Terrorists" mail....go for it!!!!
If something got blown up due to corresponence, the Liberals would be the first to yell, "Why didn't you do something about it? Why didn't you and the CIA know about it?"
2007-01-04 08:12:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by PoliticallyIncorrect 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Thus far he has proven to be and stand for everything that I expected him to. No surprises here!
So, to answer your question - Not in this lifetime!
2007-01-04 08:12:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by LadySable 6
·
1⤊
1⤋