Should he just VETO all the liberal legislation sent to him?
2007-01-04 05:56:21 · 24 answers · asked by GJfromfla 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It may be the only thing that can save us working people.
The Democrats will be coming after us.
2007-01-04 06:03:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
He should do what he feels is right with each individual piece of legislation. If that is a veto, then I guess it is a veto; but he should examine each bill independently and try to do what he feels is best for the country. I don't feel very confident that this will happen though, I think he will do what is best for the rich people and that will probably mean a veto for every piece of liberal legislation, because it is not usually best for the rich; just for the people.
2007-01-04 14:00:35 · answer #2 · answered by irongrama 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well, it would take a lot. First off, Bush would have to learn what is best for the country, he hasn't yet and most of his policies and acts have done nothing good for the country.
By the way, didn't Ford, the centrist, put Justice Stevens on the High Court? Yes, that Justice Stevens, the one all the conservatives point to as bad, and all the rest of us point to as a Patriot.
2007-01-04 14:04:58 · answer #3 · answered by vertical732 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe not all of the Liberal legislation, but certainly most of it....what isnt vetoed could easily be recycled into the Sunday comics.
2007-01-04 14:00:52 · answer #4 · answered by PoliticallyIncorrect 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What? Why would he do that? He may veto all the bills that he disagrees with, but congress could just overturn his veto.
2007-01-04 14:01:21 · answer #5 · answered by Titainsrule 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think what makes sense should be considered.But as far as financially raping anyone who makes over $33,000 a year-what the Democrats call"the rich"Veto!
2007-01-04 13:59:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes, he should. Socialistic ideals are not what our country stands on. They will only weaken our economy, our education, our health. But then again, all Bush has wanted to do is spend, spend, spend.
2007-01-04 14:04:24 · answer #7 · answered by Jon M 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
He should have started six years ago, with the spendthrift Republicans!
Better late than never . . .
2007-01-04 14:02:10 · answer #8 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He's already late (to the brain distribution center)
2007-01-04 13:58:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, bipartisanship will work if both sides will just try it for once.
2007-01-04 14:00:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋