2007-01-04 05:54:34 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It isn't; and out of hundreds of cases (perhaps thousands) warrants were only refused a couple of times. That's the big argument when it comes to all this snooping. Warrants are easily obtained and the legal way to go......so why do some insist that the system is inhibiting investigation?
2007-01-04 06:09:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but if you get a warrant there is a paper trail of who you are illegaly spying on.
2007-01-04 13:57:16 · answer #2 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
For the government, it isn't. With the PATRIOT act, all they have to do is say that it will help in the fight against terrorism.
2007-01-04 14:01:54 · answer #3 · answered by greencoke 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It isn't. All you have to do is petition the court and have a valid substantial reason.
2007-01-04 14:00:00 · answer #4 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
http://www.nydailynews.com/
GW Bush can do it without a warrant
2007-01-04 14:01:41 · answer #5 · answered by lovefights 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because of privacy laws
2007-01-04 13:57:45 · answer #6 · answered by woody 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋