being that we never found WMDs and want to war over nothing killing 1000s of people
2007-01-04 05:47:51 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
In the name of Dustin Donica, the 3,000th U.S. soldier to die in Iraq...... Yes.
2007-01-04 05:53:26 · answer #1 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
And who, of the people who actually have the authority to do so, are "demanding that Cheney be tried for war crimes"? Can you name one member of the ICJ that has called for an indictment of the former vice-president? Do you even know what the ICJ is? Heck, I think OJ did murder his ex-wife and her boyfriend, but that does not mean that there should be another trial just because of what I think. The same goes for you, > Anybody who does actual research will tell you that websites are not true documentation. I asked you to name one (just one) member of the ICJ that is even considering issuing an indictment to Dick Cheney and you post a website that is not from the ICJ. Guess what, the three morons from "Loose Change" have a website. Is that evidence? Of course not. There is more evidence that Bigfoot exists. How about you have some refresher on how to do actual research and check out the ICJ. Then come back with what you have. >BTW. I did bother to do some research for on this matter. The ICJ deals with international agreements, not war crimes. However, the International Criminal Court does prosecute war crimes and crimes against humanity; they have issued warrants to the president of Sudan recently. The ICC has received hundreds of complaints concerning the 2003 invasion of Iraq, but has not found any basis for issuing any warrants, much less indictments.
2016-05-23 03:04:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What war crimes? Iraq consistently blocked UN weapons inspectors from doing their jobs. He agreed to do that at the end of Desert Storm. We bombed that country many times during Clinton's presidency and nobody had a problem with it.
2007-01-04 05:59:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Are you also willing to prosecute all the Democrats that signed the bill allowing him to go to war? They had access to all the same information and evidence that Bush had. Should they also be prosecuted or does that line of reasoning only apply to one party?
2007-01-04 05:59:20 · answer #4 · answered by anarchisthippy 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
don't forget all the lives lost during 9/11 attacks on the WTC by the CIA
Bush is a crimminal
2007-01-04 06:04:39 · answer #5 · answered by lovefights 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, they should not be prosecuted nor will they be. There were WMDs found and there were also other reasons we went to war.
I think John Kerry should be prosecuted as a traitor.
2007-01-04 05:52:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Only after Clinton is tried for treason for not taking custody of Bin Laden when he was offered up in the '90s. This is akin to being an accessory to the WTC attacks of 9/11.
2007-01-04 05:51:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 5⤋
how can one "want to war"
regardless, we found WMD's we found evidence of there existence, and we toppled one of the worst dictators of this generation.
so what would there crimes be again?
2007-01-04 05:53:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
that would be the worst thing to do. I'm not the biggest Bush fan, but that would show the mid. east how weak we would be.
2007-01-04 06:15:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
There are no War Crimes.
You surely didn't fall for the Democrats' campaign promises, did you?
Ho. Ho.
2007-01-04 05:52:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋