OK, 9/11 truth movement peeps. Riddle me this:
Heat kinks---is a railroad term for the tracks deforming due to summer heat.
http://www.vre.org/service/commuterweekly/archives/sunkinks.htm
http://www.depotnews.com/CSX/020801CSXa.htm
http://whyfiles.org/069renew_energy/1.html
The tracks can shift from mere inches to feet.
So, if the SUN can "kink" steel and deform it. Why is it so hard to fathom a 700-1000 Deg F fire could not kink and cause structural failure to the buildings of the WTC??
2007-01-04 05:41:00 · 12 answers · asked by devilduck74 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Skycrapers do not fall from fire:: HUMM?
That is true. But, not one of the buildings discussed.. Have commerical jet flying though them either. Find one of those
2007-01-04 06:37:42 · update #1
I no longer answer 9/11 theory believers,,I began to feel sorry for them because anyone who assumes truth with out facts are bound to bring disappointment on them selves !
To all 9/11 theory believers ..here is a fact for you...not one theory is accepted in the scientific community ..not one ..put that in your pipe and smoke it !!
2007-01-04 05:52:16 · answer #1 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I for one have always questioned the amount of architects and engineers used to try to claim it was an "inside job" or some other sort of conspiracy linked to the fall. Mainly - the lack of such. Yes, I know there are a lot, but it still seems smaller than those who accept it, which is where I put my faith in personally. I will admit, I know nothing about physics beyond what I took in college for the MCAT. I could be wrong. But I'm not convinced. I'm not sure if this is valid support or not... there are a few factors that are glaringly different between the two, but if the concepts are applicable then it does provide good support.
2016-05-23 03:03:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 planes hit 2 towers 3 towers fell. All 3 fell in their imprint
2007-01-04 08:54:40 · answer #3 · answered by lalalalaconnectthedots 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey stop wasting your time with 911 conspiracy theorist their logic is not existant just by reading some of the response here should convince you of that.
The best thing to do is stop responding to their idiotic questions.
2007-01-04 06:49:08 · answer #4 · answered by Ynot! 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Um. Are people questioning why the Towers fell? I didn't know about the kink, though thanks, I work next to train tracks.
2007-01-04 05:44:24 · answer #5 · answered by Jessy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well u have to realize that trains have steel wheels so they cause friction and the rail heats up, causing it to change. Also the weight of the train. that would be like the tectonic plates rubbing against each other.
2007-01-04 05:45:00 · answer #6 · answered by AvO21 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That doesn't explain the explosions I heard before the buildings fell, sounded, and felt like explosives I hear everyday, used in a quarry near my house, fireman in the building say they heard explosions too, also many high-rise buildings have burned at high temperature and not succumb to "heat kinks"
2007-01-04 05:50:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
yes that`s true but if you watch the video after the planes hit 10-15minutes later you see a huge explosion,that can`t be left over jet fuel
2007-01-04 05:46:45 · answer #8 · answered by lily 4 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Can you really imagine that 90 strong, firm, solid floors that were not burning....actually fail to support 10 floors above that collapsed?
2007-01-04 05:44:46 · answer #9 · answered by davemg21 3 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I am not a 911 truth person, but I could answer for them.
"Bush suxs!"
That is as far ar their intelligence goes.
2007-01-04 05:43:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋