2007-01-04 05:18:13 · 17 answers · asked by dss 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
**** i'd go down on him just to get him impeached. take one for the team if if you will.
2007-01-04 05:29:26 · answer #1 · answered by peach 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Slim............I believe that Congress could gather up the necessary info that "W" did commit crimes BUT there is a big election coming up in 2008 and I believe the Dems are more fiscally conservative about NOT spending millions of dollars on investigations since we have the HIGHEST deficit ever right now.
Americans spoke in last election..........If Bush chooses to be a Bully for his last 2 years then it only hurts his party in 2008
2007-01-04 05:30:56 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. Zhivago 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
ZERO. What did he do? War crimes, treason, screwing his intern? None of that stuff. He's been villiafied for standing firm on issues he believes strongly in, even when its not the popular media opinion. There is a very large portion of the country that still backs him and his decisions. The same portion that voted him into office. Don't believe every Gallop poll or survey you see on TV.
2007-01-04 05:40:06 · answer #3 · answered by Johnny Z 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First, Valerie Plame grew to become into now no longer a CIA operative on the time the thoughts grew to become into "leaked", and the thoughts were declassified. for this reason, no longer a leak. meaning, no longer treason. 2d, the "wiretapping" grew to become into legal...regardless of the undeniable fact that no person's lines have been incredibly "tapped". (It grew to become into in a piece of writing that grew to become into buried interior of a nicely-standard newspaper, between the 1st to launch the story, BTW.) acquiring the telephone documents grew to become into legal regardless of the undeniable fact that, the two way, and not remarkable. J. Edgar Hoover did warrantless twine-tapping whilst he grew to become into head of the FBI, and yet regardless of the debate, he wasn't taken out of workplace. and you in no way understand who's in contact with al-Qaida and who isn't. bear in suggestions, the adult adult males that hijacked those planes on 9/11 were in the rustic for months, and no person had a clue what they have been making plans. third, considering the fact that whilst did he individually bribe human beings to plant thoughts? the place is the evidence of this? And is it from a nonpartisan source? No, President Bush should not be impeached. He has made judgements that individuals disagreed with, yet weren't unlawful. he's purely in workplace for under 2 years extra, then you definately can choose somebody else. recover from it.
2016-10-29 23:55:45 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Congress were to conduct a witch hunt of the same magnitude as was conducted against Clinton, there would be a very good change of it happening.
2007-01-04 06:28:46 · answer #5 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sadly and sickly, very few. bush has committed crimes bigger than space, but this world is so screwed that no, sir bush will probably never be impeached
2007-01-04 06:14:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anna 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nil. Democrats will probably have the White House in 2008, they'll probably just wait until then.
2007-01-04 05:36:52 · answer #7 · answered by crank726 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No chance. Forget about it. Not going to happen. Theere are only a few democrats who would like to get this started. There is not enough support in Congress.
2007-01-04 05:25:54 · answer #8 · answered by Clemm T 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A president has to commit a crime to be impeached.
2007-01-04 05:20:17 · answer #9 · answered by Chicken Jones 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Democrats want the Presidental office, so they want to appear to be moderates until they get it. (So very unlikely)
2007-01-04 05:26:12 · answer #10 · answered by JK 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋