why Augusto Pinochet, the dictator of Chile, who with the help of CIA, toppled the democratically elected government of Allende ,ruthlessly killed thousands of people during his rule and plundered the wealth of his country and deposited the money in foreign banks not punished by the self styled protectors of democracy? why the military junta of Myanmar , Pakistan, which deny civil rights to their opposition leaders are not punished by the world's super cop the us? why Saddam Hussein, who was once blue eyed boy of the us was assassinated brutally,? why the forces of the us and its allies not with drawn from Iraq when they could not find out any weapons of mass destruction?
2007-01-04 04:51:19 · 14 answers · asked by pretty w 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
the answer lies in your question.Saddam was tool and the hand was the USA.when Saddam invaded war against Iran and suppressed communists, he was given arms and ammunition by the us.when he began to defy the orders of the USA, all of a sudden , he became a tyrant, the us invaded Iraq and made it hot bed for Islamic terrorists and more than 6,00,000 Iraqis died after it was invaded by the us and its allies. the trial was a travesty of Justice. IT WAS CIA, WHICH HELPED OS AMA BIN LAD DEN TO TOPPLE THE GOVERNMENT IN AFGHANISTAN ,WHICH WAS BACKED BY THE SOVIETS.FOR YOUR QUESTION WHY TROOPS NOT DISPATCHED TO MYANMAR IS THERE IS NOTHING IN THAT COUNTRY TO LOOT.AND THE DICTATORS OF THOSE TWO COUNTRIES HAVE NOT ANTAGONIZED THE US.it is an irony that the HAND PUNISHED THE TOOL
2007-01-04 04:53:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 19⤊ 3⤋
Why is the sky blue pal. Misery keeps going all over the globe and it seems it won't end until we do. But, Saddam wasn't brutally assassinated, he was executed by court order. Personally I wish we had left Iraq as soon as he was caught. We have lost far too many of our people trying to give the Iraqis something they didn't apparently want and obviously don't deserve...democracy.
2007-01-04 12:57:02 · answer #2 · answered by justa 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First, Saddam was not brutally assassinated. They should have put his head on a pole in the town square.
Second its hard to find MWD's when they were given to North Korea to use at a later date.
I didn't know the US was the super cop, maybe if the UN would do their damn jobs...
2007-01-04 12:56:06 · answer #3 · answered by corryglory 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you know anything about the world and Saddam, you would realize that he is probably the 3rd most vicious and brutal leader in the past 100 years. Right behind Hitler and Pol Pot. Do a little research you will be horrified.
2007-01-04 12:54:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Quit RANTING! It's not about WMD's, prettyboy. IT'S ABOUT WORLD DOMINATION, and he who has the nukes makes the rules!
And SH assassinated??? You are not rational. So you aren't going to like or get any benefit from any input you don't agree with. Why don't you come shoot me in the head?? Oh, yeah, YOU CAN'T! Because we do a pretty good job of keeping crazies at bay!
2007-01-04 12:54:09 · answer #5 · answered by Dorothy and Toto 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
If you haven't gotten the idea by now, I doubt that you will no matter what anyone writes. Saddam assassinated? HERE'S YOUR SIGN!!!
2007-01-04 12:55:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Funny.. Saddam assassinated... lol.
2007-01-04 12:53:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
He deserves death any body whos agianst it should go talk to the familys he ruined
2007-01-04 12:54:04 · answer #8 · answered by Ghosst-guy 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Good luck with this one. Double standards comes to mined.
2007-01-04 12:57:12 · answer #9 · answered by taq 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'll leave all that up to people who get paid to worry about it.
2007-01-04 12:54:00 · answer #10 · answered by MsFancy 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋