no... because it would take mother earth along with it...
now a major infection to wipe us all out... thats more earth friendly
2007-01-04 04:53:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by r1_racer_chris 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
All existence, except possibly deep-ocean primitive marine existence, does not be able to live to tell the tale. Nuclear wintry climate might want to ensue as a results of radiation blockading solar penetrating the ambience, and the Earth might want to get very chilly. yet anyhow, an complete-scale nuclear warfare is amazingly not likely. even if WW3 befell, no human being can use nukes, because it would want to wipe each little thing out. besides, the really 2 international places that could nuke any area contained in the global warfare Russia and america. no human being else has ICBMs, so the conflict might want to be contained. It merely does not take position.
2016-12-01 19:54:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're question is only slightly flawed. The "lowest lifeform to ever infest the planet" is you and your fellow liberals. Now a limited nuclear war to annihilate aforementioned vermin would be appropriate. Could you all kindly congregate in a country you love,say Iran? I would be more than happy to press the button.
2007-01-04 04:59:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hell no!
The radiation fallout would kill all the other animals that walk thru the fallout for many many generations.
Life on Earth is an experiment. We have no rule book, especially since civilization came around. But that is no reason to give up. If we all build our homes, office buildings, factories and parking lots underground we can be more secure, have better climate control, be quieter and leave more room for animals to roam free on the surface. Don't give up HOPE!
2007-01-04 04:59:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by mark [mjimih] 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's as much good as bad in the world.. you just get to hear about the bad all the time on the news is all... plus a full scale nuclear war would leave us with only cockroaches and ferns left living.. and maybe a couple of mutated fish.....
2007-01-04 04:54:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by pip 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It depends on which life, if any, you consider valuable. If you are a cockroach, it might not kill all of you. The life support systems for most all Earth life would be FUBAR. There are apparently a lot of desolate planets. Earth is the only known one that is different.
2007-01-04 05:02:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by rhino9joe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
My answer is no. My doctor is a cardologist. He's in no position to order a war of any kind.. He's a very easy going guy, I don't believe he would order an atomic war, if he could.
2007-01-04 05:15:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
.. it would kill everything else and permanently alter most ecosystems beyond any repair ... the answer is to use the melon between our shoulders to promote the smooth flow of mother nature ... which we obviously almost fully understand but cant seem to get past our greed in making money off of abusing and wasting nature ....
2007-01-04 04:54:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dr. Strangelove, yes.
That Peter Sellers was a genius!
2007-01-04 04:51:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You in a hurry for a ticket to the afterlife, or just tired of living?
Just curious. You asked the question.
2007-01-04 05:13:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋