2007-01-04 04:30:18 · 28 answers · asked by scanning r 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
the entire trial of Saddam, was engineered by the us authorities,and it was a travesty of justice.Saddam's defense lawyers were killed under mysterious circumstances. important evidence was not shown to the defense lawyers.Saddam was prevented from questioning the witnesses testifying against him. he was to have been tried in an international court. he died like a martyr.even his last wish to be shot by a bullet was not honored.the message sent by the imperialist forces is clear.WE HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO INVADE ANY SOVEREIGN COUNTRY AS PER OUR WHIMS AND FANCIES AND REMOVE THE LEADER OF ANY COUNTRY WHO DEFIES OUR ORDERS AND WE HAVE GOT RIGHT TO ANNIHILATE ANY PERSON ON THIS EARTH.THE US EXPANSIONIST FORCES TRIED SEVERAL TIMES TO ASSASSINATE CASTRO, TOPPLED THE ELECTED GOVERNMENT OF ALLENDE OF CHILE, SUPPORTED ANTI GOVERNMENT FORCES OF NICARAGUA .THE HANDS OF THE US IMPERIALIST FORCES WERE STAINED WITH THE BLOOD OF SEVERAL THOUSANDS OF VIETNAMESE, IRAQIS, KOREANS. NOW IT IS HIGH TIME FOR ALL THE PEACE LOVING PEOPLE TO RAISE THEIR VOICES AGAINST WORLD COP, GEORGE BUSH AND HIS ONLY LOYAL ALLY BLAIR.
2007-01-04 04:33:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 20⤊ 5⤋
in case you've self assurance in capital punishment as a lot because the countries in which it has not been banned then Saddam's execution is a merely decision. yet nevertheless, the actual incontrovertible truth that the alternative change into taken by the U.S. is an open secret and seeing the perfect way Saddam change into tried -in haste and interior of a short span of time- evidently as if the dad or mum angel of justice has lengthy previous to sleep.
2016-12-01 19:53:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, ..it's completely illegal.
Yes he did many bad things ..but all presidents 've their positives and their negative actions.Nobody is perfect even that Bush.
Saddam did 0.1 of Bush crimes.Yes he killed many (Genocide) during his period (30 yrs) but US and UK forces killed over million Iraqi.
At least Saddam was uniting Shea and Sonni Muslims there...they were living together even if some of them couldn't get their all rights of political participation.But now after achieving the American freedom, u can see all Iraqis live in peace..they don't kill each other, fighting or something.
The whole thing from the beginning of the US invasion till Saddam execution is illegal.But it's not the American fault, it's the fault of the Arabs.
2007-01-04 04:51:03 · answer #3 · answered by samara 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. He deserved to die for the crime he was convicted of committing against the Shiites.
The way he was executed was very problematic politically.
While it wouldn't affect the 'justice' of Saddam Hussein's punishment, trying him for the crimes he committed against the Kurds would have given them some acknowledgement of the suffering Hussein caused them, as well.
Allowing Hussein to be taunted by Shiite executioners was very bad as well. It provides more confirmation that Iraq's government is more Shiite than Iraqi.
2007-01-04 04:37:35 · answer #4 · answered by Bob G 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. He was tried for crimes against his own people, and found guilty by the Iraqis. It's great proof that the Iraqis are running their own show. Furthermore, these poor people deserved justice after the 30 years of brutality Saddam put them through.
2007-01-04 04:38:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are we talking about the same Saddam Hussein who mass murdered hundred of people, tortured, beheaded, gassed, and otherwise exterminated others? How can you even suggest that?
I don't condone murder but he got what he deserved. Now can we stop with all the Saddam execution questions please? The man has been dead nearly a week.
2007-01-04 05:07:09 · answer #6 · answered by Dr. Quest 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do believe that the world was better off without him. He did unspeakibly horrible things, no one can argue. Justice is though a different phenomon. The people who tried and executed him didn't do it in the name of justice. It was revenge and politics. The mass murderers of Iraq now enjoy the protection of political powers both inside and outside the country.
Taunting a man who was about to get executed and dancing around his body afterwards are sick and deplorable acts.
2007-01-04 04:35:48 · answer #7 · answered by seek_fulfill 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe it was, but if it was it was Iraq's miscarriage of justice, not the US. The US was only the messenger in apprehending this man, it was not the judge of his misdeeds, it was not the jury of his misdeeds, and it was not the executioner of his misdeeds. The people of Iraq, represented by its new government, filled that void.
2007-01-04 04:41:04 · answer #8 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
miscarriage of justice??? not at all!!!
i agree that taunting him is disrespectful, but he did get off pretty easy... a shourt and painless death!!!think of all the people that slowly died in misery because of his actions..
i think they should've tied all of his limbs to different lamas and let the lamas run free
2007-01-04 04:36:03 · answer #9 · answered by krazykarl0309 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I guess it depends on your definition of justice.
2007-01-04 04:31:54 · answer #10 · answered by Blunt Honesty 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it was an incredible display of political and functional ineptitude.
2007-01-04 04:33:55 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋