Guys, I am still waiting to see some data that disproves the idea that all incremental wealth goes to the top in the US. I have data that supports this idea, which I pulled from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. I would be happy to share the data with you by request. I'm at brian.t.murphy@sbcglobal.net.
Now, I have seen a lot of the usual beligerent right wing response to my inquiries. And, some well-intentioned but unsatisfying appeals to comparative GDP growth and such. But, I haven't seen anything that can't be easily explained as a measure of growth for which all the gains go to the top.
Please present some iron-clad data that shows that people who are working hard, playing by the rules, keeping out of trouble, striving for the dream are in any way advancing their position in this country as it is currently rigged.
2007-01-04
04:28:42
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Murphy
3
in
Social Science
➔ Economics
--------------
Kevin, see your response. So, do you not have any data? The data pulls I do show that total compensation is up on real terms over the past 55 years. In fact, it's up more than 100%. However, the measure includes executive salaries and bonuses, and also medical expenses and other benefits. With the exponential growth of executive pay in the past 20 years, and the high rate of increase in medical expense -- it's possible that all the compensation increase is accounted for there.
Technology operates on the economy. It makes it possible to accomplish more with the same relative amount of resources. No argument there. I guess I would argue that the average person cannot afford goods that are worth any more today than the same relative bundle in 1950.
A computer that can now be purchased for $50 on eBay used to cost millions and fill a large room with same functionality. Bringing up technology, you have an apples to oranges in terms of economic power.
2007-01-04
08:01:03 ·
update #1