2007-01-04 04:13:32 · 8 answers · asked by L 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
pointless
2007-01-04 04:15:04 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam was deprived of his post and was only a prishioner. He was lucky to be in the hands of American who after arresting him, treated well. There was no guarantee of his safety in Iraqi hands. He was ineffective. I think his death was pointless.
2007-01-04 12:36:12 · answer #2 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How many "pro", how many "pointless" ? Probably 50/50....At least in America. Rational conservatives see putting a mass murderer to death as just and expected. Liberals think it is wrong to execute mass murderers.....Basically 50/50, just like how America votes.
2007-01-04 12:40:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It was a GREAT thing. He was one evil person. His followers are evil too. I'm glad his country took care of him.
2007-01-04 12:46:20 · answer #4 · answered by buzzbait0u812 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IT WAS THE SICKEST THING I HAD TO WITNESS IN MY LIFE,BREAKING THE WORD OF GOD BEFORE THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD ,SAYING THEY BELIEVE IN GOD AND FAIL TO LIVE IN THE WORD OF GOD.DOING IT IN THE NAME OF VENGEANCE AND HATE,PEOPLE REJOICING IN DEATH AFTER WARDS
2007-01-04 13:51:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
he has to be held responsible for all the people he killed.
2007-01-04 13:11:58 · answer #6 · answered by Domino's Mom 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
killing is bad.
but he deserved it because he got 100,000's of people killed.
2007-01-04 12:25:20 · answer #7 · answered by ♥♥♥GODDESS♥♥♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was greatttttt
2007-01-04 12:15:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋