With the 100s of Billions of dollars in aid given to Africa over the last 40 years is Africa better or worse..

Question

than it was 40 years ago & why?

Answer 1

Actually, most of the aid never got to the people who really needed it. Either the government or rebel forces of the war going on at the time stole it for their use. Much of it rotted on the docks due to lack of transport to inland areas or roads blocked by wars being fought. Most cash aid went into the pockets of whatever corrupt government official got to it first. So no they aren't better off and many are worse off. Instead of 40 years of hand outs they should have been given a hand up to improve living conditions with sanitation and water projects that gave the people jobs, income, and pride in their accomplishments.

Answer 2

It's worse.
Because the aid money gives the corrupt leaders something to fight over. Look at Sudan, Nigeria, Kenya.
I've lived all over Africa, and there's absolutely no hope for the place. As soon as somebody gets into power, they and their cronies are expected to be on the 'take'.
Africa is the saddest place on Earth. And to think civilisation started there.

Answer 3

Former President Bush is unquestionably nicely-enjoyed by using the African human beings, which surprized me when you consider that he replaced into one among those failure and criminal right here at abode. He bigger help money, presented mosquito netting, and helped in somewhat some way (alongside with tries to stem the AIDS epidemic). a number of this replaced into interior the path of the Clinton humanitarian efforts, the place they worked jointly, yet some replaced into carried out on his own initiative---surprized the heck out of me that this failure as a president would desire to be so good in Africa. portion of this $eighty billion that has been pledged is designed to proceed courses former President Bush had in place, as I are conscious of it, and to stabilize fledgling governments whilst helping refugees and starving human beings in locations like Darfur or Somalia. Our u . s . a . operates on a $14 trillion funds, in accordance to Bloomberg information, so we are able to easily take care of to pay for an $eighty billion help equipment to help different worldwide locations that are suffering to grow to be democracies whilst they're dealing with devastating instances and their each and every person is homeless, starving, and in choose of scientific advice in situations individuals can't even start to think of.

Answer 4

Africa is the black hole of money graciously given by the 1st world countries. We all need to stop listening to the rants of Bono and forget about all those lost countries. They are corrupt, always have been and always will be.

Answer 5

America is a quick fix, "band-aid & duct tape" country.
Instead of trying to figure out the problems of the world and thinking of how they can help, we either throw money at them or bomb them.

Answer 6

Worse because no matter how many billions they get, they won't benefit from it as long as many of the countries have corrupt governments.

Answer 7

I'm sure you've heard the adage throwing good money after bad, the death rate continues to rise, but that is eclipsed by the birth rate. We shouldn't send money, we should send contraceptives.

Answer 8

It has gotten better, it does not happen over night nor within 40 years

Answer 9

a little better. a long term plan is needed. countries have become use to the welfare and just wait for the check.