2007-01-04 03:08:05 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
She will either be ignored or castigated.
2007-01-04 03:13:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Democrats ultimately gave up on Cindy Sheehan because of the fact she is an embarrassing mess of a woman, whose glaring loss of intelligence and undesirable judgment shines with the aid of no remember how many human beings patiently coach her. permit me coach to you that Cindy Sheehan is between the dumbest human beings on earth. ......... waiting??? In a letter from Al-Zarkawi to his followers, the grasp terrorist implored his followers to hold on in easy terms a splash longer. in spite of the fact that their reason looked hopeless against such overwhelming firepower and selection from the U.S., inevitably stupid, naive "anti-war" demonstrators might derail help for persisted protection stress help of the Iraqi government, and the insurgents might win via default. Now, think of approximately this: Liberals examine the Al Zarkawi letter. The letter it appears that evidently states the only way the insurgents can win is that if stupid human beings protest the war; in any different case, they gained't be waiting to prevail. the only reason the insurgency can get new recruits is that our vacillation provides them desire. New terrorists are recruited because of the fact they comprehend that any month now, the naive Liberals will initiate reducing investment for the yank troops. once you factor out to the Liberal they're enjoying into the terrorists' palms, they mumble some inarticulate nonense (ala Cindy Sheehan), and say they don't agree. do not agree? what's incorrect with those cretinous knucke-draggers? they only examine a letter wherein the pinnacle of the terrorist pass for sure pronounced he and his ilk could in easy terms prevail if the U.S. loses its make certain. The Democrats will possibly not continuously have the terrific innovations (or any innovations) related to foreign places coverage, yet on the optimal celebration ranges they don't look to be dumb adequate to align themselves with that fool Cindy.
2016-10-19 11:11:32 · answer #2 · answered by sachiko 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She is now more so than ever a pathetic piece of crap who has dishonored her son's memory. Heck, even her husband refused to stand by her as she denegrated her son's memory and the country. She should have had her passport revolked when she went and hung out with Hugo Chavez. The liberal news gave her far more attention than she deserves and will now probably throw her to the wolves for nolonger fitting into their paradigm of fantasy. Freedom of Speech comes with a pricetag. At the very least, people should excercise self restraint and good judgement. She and her liberal cohorts have done neither. Can you say "sedition?"
2007-01-04 03:27:22 · answer #3 · answered by Doc 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The media will love this. Cindy goal is to save our kids lives. She does not want another of children's lives lost because of lies and oil. Amazing that an ordinary citizen can see what is really going on with this war. It took the death of her beloved son for her to see the light. What will it take for the rest of us?
She wants the democrates to live up to what they said they would do - end this war. I think she sees the writing on the wall - the dems have been bought out by Bush. He gives on other things if they will give on the war and having him investigated. What a shame. I wish the dems had guts.
2007-01-04 03:14:11 · answer #4 · answered by Lou 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I think you and maybe most conservatives miss the point as to why she is protesting, She is protesting a war that has no end, unless we end it. I do not think that she is protesting repuglicans or democrats she is simply against the war, and wants her feelings known by both party's.
2007-01-04 03:17:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I loved it. It's time that the Democrats get to see what being on the receiving end of that crap is like. I hope they get more of it.
2007-01-04 13:21:34 · answer #6 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cindy Sheehan is your obsession, not the media's, not the Democrat's, O delusional one.
2007-01-04 03:11:36 · answer #7 · answered by The answer guy 3 · 1⤊ 5⤋
A fanatic protester actually disagreeing with the DNC policies - the "kiss of death" in the party for her I'm afraid.
2007-01-04 03:34:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I love it. Cindy, biting the hand that fed her.
2007-01-04 03:13:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
What was the show or article? Cite sources.
2007-01-04 03:16:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
She is a nut. I don't pay any attention to anything she says.
2007-01-04 03:16:07 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋