I'll be in a debate and saying why the bomb dropped on Hiroshima during pearl harbour was good. how do i do it

Question

The people I'm debating I've talked too outside of class and they always keep saying well lots of innocent people died because of that bomb. I say more people would have killed if the war would have kept on going on. But I dont know how too really prove my point. The debate is this afternoon and I really need help. Please help me.

Answer 1

It is obvious that the people you are debating have never been in a war.

You can argue that
1. Japan had attacked the United States
2. Japan had been on the offensive
3. The tide of battle was turning, but the US was still taking heavy casualties
4. The Japanese emporer and generals decided that they would fight to the death, proved by launching kamakazi attacks (divine wind) where the pilots died in the crash as well.
5. Something had to be done that would shorten the remainder of the war and lessen the deaths on both sides.
6. The Japanese people were willing to do whatever the emperor said.
7. The emperor needed a significant event that would prove the hopelessness of moving forward
8. Hiroshima was the first event
9. Nagasaki was the final event and changed the emperors mind
10. While tragic in outcome, the dropping of those two bombs saved the lives of potentially hundreds of people.
11. The bomb also provided an object lesson for the future which demonstrated the power of the US and stopped other countries from attacking us
12. The thought of the bomb gave the balance of power during the cold war to the US
13. The fact that the bomb was dropped has had major and far reaching consequences even to today

Answer 2

Well, first of all, the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn't occur "during" Pearl Harbor. They occured during WW2, of which the attack on Pearl Harbor was a major factor in our decision to go to war. But you're right about the number of people who would have been killed if we hadn't dropped the bombs. It was clear that the Japanese were not going to surrender. That meant we were going to have to invade the homeland of Japan, which given the fanaticism of the Japanese people at the time, would probably have meant hundreds of thousands of our soldiers would die and possibly a million or more Japanese. It's interesting to note that more Japanese died from our fire-bombing of Japanese cities than died in the two A-bombs we dropped on them. And finally, there's no denying the fact that the bombs caused the Japanese to surrender unconditionally.

Answer 3

The best excuse for using the bomb is the battle of Iwo Jima where the casualties were in the thousands but only a handfull of Japanese soldiers actually surrendered. Its easy to conclude that Japan was going to fight to the death for its mainland and the victory absolutely had to be with blatant, overwhelming force. The Japanese still didn't surrender after Hiroshima. It took a second bomb on Nagasaki before they surrendered. Conventional force would have increased the casualties exponentially and much more destruction would have taken place in Japan.

Answer 4

Reasons why th bomb dropped on Hiroshima during pearl harbour was good:
*America was attacked, and responded with deciscive force, furthermore saving lives by getting Japan to surrender instead of dragging out the war.

Answer 5

If the US had not dropped the atomic bomb in Hiroshima, Japan would have fought to the last man, woman and child. Surrender was not an option for the leaders of Japan. The cost of lives would have been millions on both sides.

Answer 6

Hard topic to debate but from what I have learned if they hadn't dropped the big bomb the war would have gone on for a lot longer then it did and a lot more lives on both sides would have been lost.

Answer 7

i think using the atom bombs have been "reliable" for 2 important motives. First, i think of if we would have invaded, the causualties would have been bigger. there is a few evidence that Japan grew to become into on the brink of renounce. on the time we would desire to no longer have standard that, or perhaps now we don't understand the way it would have performed out. as quickly as we invaded we probable would have used the bomb besides. you will discover some factors to back you up in case you study the previous few island invasions of the conflict. Civillian deaths have been undesirable. you apart from would would bring up factors with regard to the huge-unfold destruction of cities like Dresden in Germany. My 2d argument is extra theoretical. If we had no longer nuked Japan, would somebody have used them in the process the chilly conflict? those terrible photos and thoughts from Hiroshima and Nagasaki had to make human beings desire to avert there use a minimum of purely a sprint. It stimulated peace advocates and grew to become total countries faraway from nuclear study. it incredibly is a huge what if, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that it incredibly is a valid factor. That suggested, there have been some no longer so "reliable" motives to apply the bomb. ordinary revenge for Pearl Harbor. It sent a message that in case you mess with this giant we can injury you. militia prudence. in case you have a weapon use it. WW II grew to become into no longer a police action. We weren't triumphing hearts and minds. you will desire to be careful in wars like we've seen at the instant, yet WW II grew to become right into a conflict for survival. Hurray for cluster bombs, nukes, and land mines. i'm hoping if we are ever in a conflict like that returned, we don't think of two times over destroying our enemy. If we would desire to easily decide the thank you to win those new police action wars.

Answer 8

Whoa, I'd be nervous too. Take big, deep breaths, and don't worry.
Remember, after deciding what points you want to present, the MANNER of your delivery may get you as many (or more) points than the material itself. Don't let your nerves show (pretend your an actress), and put some feeling into your voice when you defend your ideas. Use some passion, convincing tones and gestures. This is a show for your teacher and class, give them something to remember. You might get points for 'chutzpah', utter nerve.
Good luck (it'll be over soon),

Answer 9

Well, it might be advisable to understand that the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima did not happen "during" Pearl Harbor, but well AFTER Pearl Harbor.

Answer 10

In the US estimation it saved millions of life's by ending the war before we had to invade Japan.
Right, get your facts straight
Pearl Harbor started the war, The bomb ended it.