2007-01-04 01:23:58 · 14 answers · asked by shadows 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
It really depends on the relative mass of the two objects and whether or not the objects in question are attached to anything. The speed or velocity of the "unstoppable" object is also important. If we assume that both the objects are free-standing (i.e. not attached to anything) and the unmovable object is stationary, then the energy from the unstoppable object will be transferred when they collide. The final result will depend on their relative mass and whether the two items will "join" after the collission (in which case they will move off together with a reduced speed - depending on their relative masses) or if they bounce apart after the collision (in which case both of the objects will move off at a speed depending on their relative masses).
2007-01-04 01:46:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If sumthing like that does exist then the unstoppable shall obviously richochet if the resistance offered by the unmovable is great or if the force of the unstoppable is greater then the unmovable will break letting the unstoppable move and it itself not moving.
It is all a case of the energies and resistance offered by the body.
2007-01-04 03:18:50 · answer #2 · answered by akshayrangasai 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The unstoppable something richochets off of the unmovable something. The unstoppable thing has to keep moving. The unmovable object cannot move. By definition of the objects, this is the only option.
2007-01-04 01:33:26 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the unmovable thing is stronger than the unstoppable,the unstoppable will either breaks or stops.That depends.
2007-01-04 01:36:46 · answer #4 · answered by pctekken 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is an invalid question, because in this universe there is no such thing as an unstoppable object or an immovable one.
In fact, if you think about it, any universe which contained one of these things could not possibly contain the other.
2007-01-04 02:52:38 · answer #5 · answered by langdonrjones 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wow how long did it take you to come up with that one?
why can't you people take from your everday experiences and put that together to form an actual answer?
my guess is, the unstoppable things huts the unmovable, and either ricochet off or kind of push itself over the onmovable object or to the side.
2007-01-04 01:29:08 · answer #6 · answered by rambocommandodude 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The unstoppable object is deflected and shoots off on a different path.
2007-01-04 02:56:07 · answer #7 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One of them has to give. Either something immovable will move, or something unstoppable will stop, or one or both will be destroyed in the collision.
2007-01-04 01:26:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
All life as you know it would stop instantaneously and every molecule in the universe would explode at the speed of light...total protonic reversal.
2007-01-04 01:34:22 · answer #9 · answered by ♫ giD∑■η ♫ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is like Ultimate Hulk fighting Classic Juggernaut. The answer is they will collide again and again forever and neither will win. They both have limitless power.
2007-01-04 01:31:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋