English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
0

Can u help me state whether each of the following functions is:-
(assuming that the domain and codomain are both contained in R (real numbers) )

(i) one to one (ii) onto (iii) both (iv) neither

(a) y = 1-x^2

(b) y = -3x

(c) y = x(1-x)(1+x)


(d) y = Ln(x)

(e) y = Sin(x)

(f) y = Tan(x)

(g) y = e^x

(h) y = 10x^3+3

2007-01-04 00:59:59 · 5 answers · asked by SHIBZ 2 in Science & Mathematics Mathematics

5 answers

I'll do some in detail and provide the answers for the rest, you really should be able to fill in the missing logic.
(a) y = 1 - x^2: not one-to-one since y(-1) = y(1) = 0. Also not onto since there is no value of x for which y > 1.

(b) both 1-1 and onto. You should be able to prove this easily.

(c) Should be obvious that this is not one-to-one (hint: you can read off three values of x for which y = 0). This is onto - note that it's continuous and has limit -infinity as x tends to +infinity, and limit +infinity as x tends to -infinity; thus y must pass through every real number (formal definition of the limit and intermediate value theorem come into play here, but really it's obvious).

(d) One-to-one and onto, but note only defined on the domain (0, infinity).

(e) Neither one-to-one nor onto; this should be obvious from the graph.

(f) Onto but not one-to-one; also obvious from the graph. Note that no periodic function can be one-to-one!

(g) One-to-one but not onto (e^x > 0 for all x) - note this is the inverse function of (d). The fact that this function is always > 0 directly relates to the domain of (d) being only for x>0.

(h) Both one-to-one and onto. Easy to prove based on the fact that x^3 is 1-1 and onto.

2007-01-04 01:13:50 · answer #1 · answered by Scarlet Manuka 7 · 0 0

Although it may not apply in this particular case, there are plenty of operations in R that are not one-to-one (arcsin, square root...); there you have to create cyclical groups and talk of "congruence". For example, number the days of the week 0=sunday, 1=monday...
How many days from sunday to wednesday? answer can be 3, 10, 17, 24... In base 7, all these numbers are congruent to 3 (i.e., they all have a remainder of 3 when divided by 7).

However, here we have simple cases. It may appear trivial, but you have to practice checking whether a function is one-to-one and onto. Later, you may have to check trickier functions.

one-to-one: for any value of x, y will have one, and only one value.
For example, y = -3x, if x = -2 then y can only be +6. y cannot have another value.

The ill-defined square root can have more than one answer: y = sqrt(x) if x = 4 then y = 2 and y = -2 are both possible values. To be a proper function, the square root must be "well-defined" (usually as the absolute value -- i.e., positive answers only); only then is it one-to-one.

onto: all values of the domain are used: for any value of y, you can find a value of x that can give you the desired y.

in the case of y = 1 - x^2, no matter how hard you try, you cannot find an x such that y = 2 (because x^2 is always non-negative, then y can never be more than 1).

If you need that function to be "onto", then you define the range as "all the real numbers such that y =< 1"

onto is not to be confused with "surjective" meaning that for any desired value y, there can only be 1 value of x. In this case again, x=1 gives y=0 AND x=-1 gives y=0; not surjective.

2007-01-04 01:33:51 · answer #2 · answered by Raymond 7 · 0 0

all functions here are 1-to-1 since most of functions in real numbers
are 1-to-1 functions

2007-01-04 01:07:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

it incredibly is my information as suited i understand now, yet do no longer carry me to something longer than 3 days, LOL! My POV is changing very straight away! no person born of lady can function right here with out the ego. it is the mechanism for concept & expression right here. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, for many individuals, we sleep, & as we sleep this "ego" has been working the instruct, so which you will desire to talk. the adaptation between us & the masters you talk of, nicely one distinction, is they have attained self mastery. Self mastery is of the ego, the kit & isn't the comparable as Enlightenment or Self cognizance it quite is of the "bigger Self or real Self". this suggests that they use the ego because it grew to become into meant for use somewhat than the ego utilising them. till now I got here right here we did no longer use this term ego, we used automatic application. I even have additionally studied ACIM & understand this grew to become into the term used, yet we observed an undisciplined ego as no longer something better than a set of set responses & classes than ran together as we slept! Ego or AP is a automobile in this point for concept & expression, a device whilst disciplined & used properly. yet whilst finally we are no longer from now on in concept, the ego will now no longer be needed & the device would be released. it is extremely confusing because of the fact even each and everything I purely defined on yet another point isn't real, because of the fact this may be a realm of phantasm of separation. yet all of us would desire to artwork in the point we detect ourselves. LOL! i do no longer understand if I helped right here or made each and everything extra confusing! Many advantages!

2016-10-29 23:32:33 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

a - iv
b - iii
c - i or iv (Not sure)
d - iv
e - iv
f - i
g - i
h - iii ( I guess )

2007-01-04 01:12:52 · answer #5 · answered by nayanmange 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers