he thinks by overcoming muslim countries,he will capture Al-Qaida or Bin laden,but the war has just started.even by killing Bin Laden,terrorism will not finish,more Bin Ladens will emerge,becoz of the terrorist activities of Israel in Palestine and this is becoz US backs Israel and supports Israel,otherwise Israel is nothing but a small country for the muslim country to get rid of it.But US backs all the defense sysytem of Israel,and Israel is pretending itself to be a lion in the middleast.but it is nothing. nothing.they r cowards.
2007-01-04 00:18:00 · 8 answers · asked by Tzaneen 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Cowards huh?Suicide bombers in ice cream parlors,pizza joints and you call them cowards?? What bull
2007-01-04 00:43:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Al Qeda is more of a club than a military. Bin Laden is a selfish and crazed man with a lot of resources and a strong grudge against his father and Saudi Arabia. Al Qeda still exists because Bin Laden is able to pesuade Muslims to conform to and act on his ideology which is a perversion Islam. You have a point with Israel. The existence of the Israel and the military actions are a perfect example of how to incite violence by Muslim extremists. So yes I agree we need to rethink our relations with Israel but that is not the only way were going to stop Al Qeda. Bin Laden is less of a military leader as he is a philosopher.
2007-01-04 15:40:43 · answer #2 · answered by Yahoo Sucks 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not a religious war nor war for overcoming any nation. Americans have their economic and security interest which they will protect at any cost.This war has been named 'war against terrorism'. Opposition forces must join the mainstream or face defeat. However, the best way to resolve political issues is to bring opposing group to negotiating table- a very hard job. Bin Laden is ineffective. No doubt America is supporting Israel, it does not mean that Mr. Bush is not supporting Palestinian. One point must be remembered. USA has to work within the framework of United Nations and American Law.
2007-01-04 08:45:04 · answer #3 · answered by snashraf 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I continue to be amazed at the twisted rationale of some people. How you can condemn Israel for what is going on is far beyond the pale...They have been under constant attack for more than 60 years and you have the audacity to state what you just did!!!! They remain under daily attack even to this day...How can you justify turning that completely around and try to make them sound like the bad guys????? Is this just a convenient way to justify your hatred and the constant refusal to attain a peace accord to allow your citizens to live in peace.. Every peace attempt has failed, not because of Israel but because of the Palestinians....Arafat blankly refused to accept peace.. and the groups you have there now are carrying on his wishes.. You really are not interested in peace and you know it!!
Bush is after the terrorists only because of the threat they pose to western civilization.. you know that also.. Why not stick with the truth??? If you count the countries Islam is attacking presently, you would realize your argument carries no weight...This knowledge is known far beyond Bush and his advisors. It is now being well felt in Spain, as well as other countries in Europe. Many people have taken the time to read your Koran and realize the danger it proposes and demands, for infidels.
2007-01-04 08:44:11 · answer #4 · answered by mrcricket1932 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First off...one must recognize who the REAL terrorists are. They are NOT who you think. The USA needs to mind its own business and stay out of world affairs(unless it concerns us directly). In one of Bush's campaign speeches, he said we would not be peace keepers of the world. I guess he changed his mind huh? But instead of actually being peacekeepers...seems like we are the ones wagging war on the world. And why is that? Could it be for nothing more than a barrel or two of oil? We are acting like school yard bullies.....as far as I am concerned anyway.
2007-01-04 10:33:22 · answer #5 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
but if he hadn't have tried, the current bin Laden's and Al Quaida's would have been around, as well as the new ones that will rise. --More people all against us.
2007-01-04 08:26:35 · answer #6 · answered by Mat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bin Linden is sneaky
2007-01-04 16:41:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
then why didn't you get rid of it 60 years ago.
2007-01-04 22:50:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋