All you ever hear about is how we shouldn't be in Iraq. Well at least Bush had the guts to do something unlike most of the pansies who preach we shouldn't be at war. How many other places in the world are getting bombed? Saddam deserved to die. So do all the terrorists. The more Bush goes after the better. The prostesters of Bush and the government are going after the wrong people. Why not bash the Terrorists because they are the ones who are insane!?!
2007-01-03
22:39:50
·
25 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
I mentioned other countries getting bombed because they are doing nothing as far as I know. I'm saying something has to be done otherwise they'll just keep coming after us and think they can get away with it. I wish do god I was drunk. Then I wouldn't have to think about the stupidity of this world.
2007-01-03
22:48:09 ·
update #1
I never said I liked Bush. All I think is at least he is doing something about the current problem.
2007-01-03
22:51:43 ·
update #2
Thanks to some of you, you are helping in my understanding of why people do it. It just never made sense to me.
2007-01-03
22:53:36 ·
update #3
It is easier for some people to blame their own government because it is safe for them. They know that the government is not really out to kill them, but terrorists are a different matter. In order to properly blame terrorists they have to face the fact that people are trying to kill them for no reason other than different beliefs. Many people cannot wrap their minds around this basic concept. It stems from making the mistake that all people are basically the same. They wrongfully believe that people could not really think this way and that if we would just stop antagonizing them that they would somehow suddenly become reasonable and stop their efforts because after all, how can you kill someone who cares about you? Many more people held this view before 911 regarding terrorism. They considered terrorism just a regional issue which did not really effect the United States' security, even if the occasional embassy was bombed. It is easy to hold this opinion when you are not being attacked directly every day and this opinion grows as people find comfort in the fact that there are not any new attacks to cite. What they fail to consider is the reason why there have not been any new attacks. The simple fact is that we will be attacked again at some point and when it happens these same people will blame the powers that be for not properly protecting them.
2007-01-03 23:05:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Bryan 7
·
4⤊
6⤋
Because people still believe that the media tells the truth, the Democratic Party is for the poor and working people, that Bush is in the oil companies pockets, that Karl Rove is evil and so on. Finding out the truth is hard work, it requires you to actually do something. It's much easier to bash Bush, because it makes you sound as if you were witty without having to go through all the bother of actually reading a book or thinking before you speak,or something...besides, the terrorist have darker skin than white people...it would be racist to bash them, even if they are fascists and maniacs.
2007-01-04 01:23:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sartoris 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Your question is defective. It assumes the only selections are to the two do only as he has performed, or do no longer something. There are one thousand issues Bush could have performed in any different case that would have more suitable the area, however the conflict in Iraq grew to become into his selection and not something grew to become into going to give up him from invading. Why else do you think of they got here out with all that phony intel? They lied to make the case for a conflict that during no way had to happen, and the american public believed the lies. Iraq had no longer something to do with 9/11. If Bush wasn't so hell bent on invading Iraq, and fairly used a number of those materials on finding the individuals who have been surely responsible for 9/11, we would in all probability have destroyed al Qaeda through now. fairly we are enjoying around in Iraq and the real enemy is in Afghanistan turning out to be greater suitable through the day. what is going to Bush say as quickly as we are attacked back? How will he preserve his own anti-Saddam vendetta while some greater of our homes are smoldering and a few thousand greater of our everybody is ineffective? through ways, human beings like fubar, who parrot the rightwing social gathering line whilst calling loose thinkers "sheep" are a great part of the priority.
2016-11-26 02:29:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes Bush had the guts to do something. However, he lied about what that something was. How can we support a man that invades a country under false pretenses? Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 so how can you say invading Iraq was the right thing to do? I agree that what Saddam did was desbicable and unforgivable, but how can we take someone else's life? What does Saddam learn by being executed? To not do it again?
Remember that to be a terrorist is just to be one that incites terror. By that definition Bush is a terrorist. With the terror alerts constantly on high and constant reminders to be on the lookout Bush has the American public living in a constant state of fear, which of course proves that what he is doing must be correct and thus bolsters support for him.
No one is supporting the terrorists, but demanding accountability from elected officials is more important than "bashing" nameless people that will never hear it or care about it if they do....
2007-01-03 22:52:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by lady j 2
·
6⤊
5⤋
Please read this twice...
Osama Bin Laden and Al Quada sent video tapes around the world and proclaimed responsibility for the 9/11 attacks!
Back in the 90's when Iraq invaded Kuwait he did so with the acknowledement of the United States officials that they would not get involved. It wasn't until Saudi Arabia {The Bin Laden family---Bush family business partners} asked the United States to intervene that we finally took military action in Desert Storm.
The Bush family---OIL The Bin Laden family---OIL--- OPEC---KB&R{HALLIBURTON} Vice-President Cheney The Carlyle Group!!!!!! Seriously can anyone really not see the rabbit behind the magicians back.
Every person involved with the companies that I have mentioned in the previous paragraph stand to gain a HUGE financial windfall by the rebuilding and rechanneling of Iraq's natural resources!
Every American wants the perpetrators of 9/11 brought to justice. Fortunately NOW even the Rep. party members who are tired of "staying the course" with an administration that got caught lining their pockets are calling for the madness to stop!!
Not wanting to wage war doesn't make you a pansy. It makes you accountable to the human race.
2007-01-03 23:04:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
What we are protesting is the fact that Saddam was a neutered nothing after we were done with him the first time around. He was not involved in the terrorist attacks, as Bush finally admitted:
"No, we've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with September the 11th," Bush said.
Saddam was a freak and a genocidal killer. If we are willing to do nothing when Kabame of Rwanda kills 800,000 Tutsies, and then spend BILLIONS of dollars because we can prove that Saddam killed 147 Kurds in 1987 with the weapons and money that WE gave him, then there is something wrong with the system
2007-01-03 22:46:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
6⤋
I bash terrorists all the time. So your statement is a lie.
2007-01-04 04:25:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Darth Vader 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Many people outside the USA consider Bush to be a terrorist. You like bashing terrorists? Ultimately, its you (the consumer) who sponsors terrorism by paying higher fuel prices to people who directly support and promote terrorism. So perhaps you should reconsider who actually is insane.
2007-01-03 22:57:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Biz 2
·
4⤊
4⤋
Its sickening I know but the sad truth is it's all politics and the Democrats do not have never and are unlikely to in the future think of the American people or their security before they think of themselves and their power. The media is becoming a joke in that they are sooooo skewed towards the liberal and Democrat agenda that they are blind to what is really happening and dont (or wont) report anything that portrays the republican party and especially G W B in a positive light. For example they were all a twitter about N. Polosi having a street named after her and ignored the real story out there did you know that we fought and killed Iranian special forces in Iraq who were attacking us and Iraqi civilians? No of course you didnt but it is true look it up. There is an old axiom used by the members of the media that says good news does not sell I think it would be more appropriate now to say good news does not sell some peoples agenda.
2007-01-03 22:56:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by crawler 4
·
5⤊
7⤋
Fine give me the address of the terrorists and I'll bash them.
2007-01-03 22:42:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by (^_^) 5
·
8⤊
2⤋