How do you justify a statement like that? Wouldn't that make you a traitor to your own people and government? Bush was elected twice,in 08 he can no longer hold the office,he has not rounded up those who voted against him,he has not killed his political opponents.Your statement is not rational.
2007-01-03 22:33:01 · 15 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Mikey; who has Bush murdered?
2007-01-03 22:38:47 · update #1
Well, you gotta admit. If you're looking for irrational statements, Yahoo Answers is a good place to start.
2007-01-03 22:38:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
I can't justify a statement like that, but the hanging of Saddam was just one more life taken that Americans feel responsible for in a war they can no longer justify.
We no longer know if invading Iraq was the right thing to do. Tens of thousands of people have died, and the level of unrest in the country continues to rise. The WMD reported in Saddam's hands were never discovered. No link to 9/11 was found. And, the people of Iraq obviously don't want us there.
Is it any wonder Americans feel guilt over allowing this war to happen in the first place? I think those people who say Bush should be hanged are just trying to lay blame on Bush for the responsibility of a mistaken invasion.
2007-01-03 23:22:48 · answer #2 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Saddam did deserve to be hanged for heinous crimes he made against his own fellow Iraqis and God. Bush, on the other hand, does desrve a punishment.why? if it wasn't for his and his adviser's mistake in invading Iraq, thinking it was the main source of black market nukes instead of Iran, then there wouldn't be a catastrophe in the middle East today. They should have declared war on IRAN not Iraq.
This answer does not betray the US government or the American people. Also, what is the point in ur asking this if u do not accept the answers of those u think are betraying the American government or people simply by saying what they think is right?
2007-01-03 23:30:52 · answer #3 · answered by bradshaw 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would not cry if that happened to him. Due to Bush's failed war in Iraq, scores of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians have needlessly died over the past 3 years. And now we are mired down in the middle of what has become a civil war.
None of this had to happen. Iraq posed no threat to us at the time.
For what its worth, Bush's first election was stolen when the USSC appointed him to the presidency. Traitor ? No. I support the US Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Does Bush ? Once upon a time we used to have habeas corpus until the MCA bill was passed. Our own government is more of a potential threat to its own citizens than Iraq ever was. And as far as Saddams execution and snuff film, it does not matter what I think. This is the affair of the people of Iraq.
2007-01-03 23:06:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
The Saddam Hussein loss of existence penalty replaced into achieved in a manner that confirmed us merely how horrific we can be as human beings. It replaced into unjust. He replaced right into a dictator definite and he killed lots of his very own those with poison gasoline and so on and so on. yet at the instant the country remains in a shambles and a million.5 million Iraqis have been killed via the coalition forces on condition that Iraq replaced into invaded. Who could pass to the gallows for that? And whilst do the war crimes trials initiate?
2016-10-19 11:02:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Trust me, its either people who really have no respect for America and hate it who are saying that, or non Americans (and most likely terrorist sympathizers. I had some idiot email me and tell me he spit on the ground for ever person who died on 9/11)
Either way its times like these that I wish the patriot act would come into play. Hell, those assassination questions are the ones that really drive me crazy. I hope those people are rotting in jail right now, enjoying a break from Jihad at club Gitmo
2007-01-04 12:37:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
"The grand strategy authorizes Washington to carry out “preventive war”: Preventive, not pre-emptive. Whatever the justifications for pre-emptive war might be, they do not hold for preventive war, particularly as that concept is interpreted by its current enthusiasts: the use of military force to eliminate an invented or imagined threat, so that even the term “preventive” is too charitable. Preventive war is, very simply, the “supreme crime” condemned at Nuremberg."
2007-01-03 23:09:06 · answer #7 · answered by Ringo G. 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
how can you hang a person that was given the OK by congress?
I believe Gore won the election and Bush was put in office by his daddies buddies setting on the bench. I could be wrong but glad it turned out the way it did.
2007-01-03 22:44:18 · answer #8 · answered by Dave 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Murder is murder,they both deserve hanging.
Edit:Just as Hitler never murdered a Jew in person,the buck stopped with him.By illegally invading Iraq,any killing carried out by American forces is,there-fore, illegal under international law.The only reason Bush has not been charged before the International Court is because no country is powerful enough to enforce the law.Bush is a murderer,but he will get away with it,unfortunately.
2007-01-03 22:36:07 · answer #9 · answered by michael k 6 · 2⤊ 6⤋
Saddam was a monster. I read his biography and was horrified at the deeds attributed to him. Bush is a decent man trying to do the job he was elected to do in the face of unrelenting hostility from people who often appear to be completely deranged by bias and hatred. You are correct in your assesment that most of the calumny and slander hurled at Bush appear completely irrational or worse.
2007-01-03 22:42:59 · answer #10 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 6⤊ 4⤋