British Columbia already has many facilities suitable for the olympics which reduces construction costs, and those that need to be built are within the budget of the province, the third richest economy in Canada. If BC were a US state, it would be among the wealthiest in the US.
Whistler mountain has been part of the World Cup ski circuit for decades, and cross country skiing also goes on in the area. A bobsleigh/luge track and ski jump need to be built, but they're feasible and the Pacific Range mountains are large enough. Also, Vancouver has two existing full-sized ice rinks (GM Place and the Pacific Coliseum) for hockey, figure skating, and short track speed skating; a long track speed skating facility is one of the few things that need to be built.
Additional:
You ask about it, and then it happens: BC Place stadium's roof is torn thanks to a freak wind. You have to wonder if the IOC is nervous about the first indoor opening and closing ceremonies at a summer or winter games.
Normally Vancouver is protected by the coastal mountains, and the land south of the Fraser offers protection from the ocean, so the wind that tore the hole was unusual. Minnesota's dome is an exact twin (no pun intended) of BC Place, and it has never been damaged despite the harsh Minnesota winters which are - believe it or not - colder and windier than Vancouver's winters.
Thankfully, BC Place has a cloth roof held up by powered fans, so there are no heavy objects to fall on people, unlike the Kingdome in Seattle. (Remember the tiles that fell _during_ a Seattle Mariners game?) Also, during the construction of BC Place, the ring that holds the roof on was deliberately built higher than required; when the cloth roof was completely unsupported yesterday, the nearest the cloth came to any seats or the floor was 15 metres (50 feet). Had people been inside when it was torn and fell, nobody would have been touched by the cloth.
The stadium will be fixed in time for the next music event in two weeks.
.
2007-01-05 02:55:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
regrettably the probability isn't any longer great. i'm 17 besides, and this summer season grew to become into unforgettable. London grew to become into the 1st city to host the video games three times in a row. internet hosting the Olympics takes years of making plans, and not common artwork and somewhat some money, and that's only the bidding. it somewhat is unhappy to declare that a minimum of, for the subsequent 50 ordinary years it somewhat isn't any longer at risk of happen back, it somewhat is in basic terms too costly for the government and many human beings could question a determination to stick to back while the money ought to in all probability be positioned to better use. despite if we've been positioned forward for yet another bid, the probabilities of the IOC finding out on a GB city to host the video games back could be distinctly no longer likely, yet nonetheless which you in no way understand. i think of the reality the London 2012 grew to become into possibly arguably between the final ever Olympic video games, could additionally positioned organizers off wanting to 'cloud' final years fulfillment. As for Rio 2016, the time difference is around 7 hours i think of. this could advise that interior the night interior the united kingdom, activities could only be commencing, and could then proceed into the night. even however you will in all probability locate that there are various highlights classes working throughout the time of the day to maintain us as much as this factor. with a bit of luck, activities could additionally be available on iplayer or the BBC web site, and that i'm confident they are guaranteed to broadcast what we omit interior the night during day time television some hours later besides.
2016-11-26 02:25:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
With the stormy weather in the Pacific Northwest now, the snow will not be a problem if it duplicates itself in Winter Olympics of 2010. It even snowed a bit in the Nevada desert.
2007-01-03 21:25:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by QuiteNewHere 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why not?They've got the climate,so no real problem.
2007-01-03 21:21:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋