This was the first trial. He was found guilty of having killed 150 Kurdes in a village but he wasn't found guilty for the 150,000 others he killed.Don't you think the family of the victims would have liked him to be judged before ?
2007-01-03 20:44:39 · 12 answers · asked by Audrey 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article2114403.ece
2007-01-03 20:47:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As much as the SOB deserved just what he got, the Iraqis couldn't have done the execution in a worse way. Hollering at him,spreading more of this civil war and sunni vs shia crap. How in the world is that God forsaken country ever dong to be worth a damn? Screw 'em all. No more American deaths. Let the bas***ds kill each other.
2007-01-03 21:13:56 · answer #2 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really, in this part of the world such things are irrelevant. Everyone knows that Saddam killed those people, and I do believe they wated to see him dead ASAP. Also, they wanted to keep the Sunnis from organisig and creating riots and such.
2007-01-03 20:54:31 · answer #3 · answered by Robert Bradbury 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saddam has by now met the judge that really matters. Count on two things. One, saddam has now been judged for his entire life. Two, he did not like the way it came out.
2007-01-03 20:51:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it matters. We could have tried him for the next 20 years in several different countries. Everyone he wronged should rest assured the Higher Power is judging him now.
2007-01-03 20:50:05 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever the case, you can't rely on a perfect and just legal system anywhere. People were tired of waiting for results, and justice systems tend to bend easily to higher powers. It's just the way of things.
2007-01-03 20:49:56 · answer #6 · answered by KyLeth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everyone knew he was guilty even those families,why waste more time and money on proving it when he never tried to hide the crap to begin with. GOOD RIDDANCE to him and his sons. I`m sure they are feeling the heat as we speak.
2007-01-03 23:40:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes maybe, but if you look n other side, there are some people who killed loads iraqi ppl, and they should be hung 1st.. no need 2 mention who they are..
2007-01-03 20:49:03 · answer #8 · answered by Scaryhunter 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because as far as I know you can only die once from hanging but when they can regurgitate a criminal to be tried for more crimes I guess they will just bounce him off the gallows as many times as they think are just. Ya think?
2007-01-03 20:53:24 · answer #9 · answered by crusinthru 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was only a small preview of what is in store for ordinary U.S. citizens in the near future!...
http://www.global-conspiracies.com/fema_concentration_camps.htm
2007-01-04 12:50:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋