2007-01-03 20:04:10 · 9 answers · asked by neoconammo 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
It's not the women working harder to conceive...It's the FACT that...that will take place after they invade for the Democratic pledge to pardon the crime of invasion.
2007-01-03 22:26:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
Third world countries aren't poor because they have too many people. Look at their population density compared to the US or Britain. The nice countries have denser populations than the messy ones.
They aren't poor because they have too many children. In a pre-industrial environmnet, if you don't have lots of kids, you don't have enough working hands around to produce the food you need to eat. Encourage them to have fewer children, and you've condemned them to starve.
(Imagine the graph showing how large a family has to be before you can feed the family if each male over 8 can do enough labor to produce the food 1.25 people needs to eat.)
And they don't fight because they are poor. They are poor because they are aggressive and war like, and they have backwards cultures that are counterproductive when it comes to human existence.
But will democrats make it worse. Probably. They'll throw a bunch of money at the issue, which won't do any good because the problems are cultural, which they won't address because that's taboo. Does that make it worse. No. Until you think clearly and realize that all they've done is keep the status quo in the thirld world and raise my taxes in the first.
The thirld world has problems because it has problems. We should give them enough so they don't freak out so much they cause us problems, but realize we can't solve theirs. USe that money here. Preferably but not taxing it away from people, and giving them the freedom to use it however they have discerned will benefit their life the most.
2007-01-04 06:09:45 · answer #2 · answered by 0 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In what way does a democratic victory affect the reproductive rates of third world countries?
2007-01-04 04:10:30 · answer #3 · answered by joecool123_us 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I am afraid that in your zeal you have forgotten that babies are not made in a machine, they are given birth by women. In thrird world countries women often become pregnant because they were raped. I really don't see how republicans have reduced the amount of crime aginst women in third world countries.
2007-01-04 04:09:25 · answer #4 · answered by vampire_kitti 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Haven't you used up your question asking abilities yet??
Why do I get the impression you are a young male?
All those "baby making machines" you are referring to didn't get pregnant all by themselves, sparky!!
I am pretty sure that anyone who is a Republican or even a Radical Conservative is ashamed that you are on their ticket!
2007-01-04 04:28:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, because dems. do believe in birth control, as a way to prevent abortion. reps. only believe in abstinence only. not realising that throughout history abstinance has never been prcticed as evidenced in the bible or else fornication wouldn't have been any issue in the bible .
2007-01-04 04:10:09 · answer #6 · answered by chuckleslovesjesus 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, if anything they will slow down because dems go for real solutions when it comes to preventing pregnancy. Birth control and education on safe sex versus abstinence which ain't gonna happen!
2007-01-04 04:12:54 · answer #7 · answered by Jamie R 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
They run crazy in America... And you're the one against aborting those children.
2007-01-04 04:11:52 · answer #8 · answered by NONAME 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
1984 was when it started. You are clueless.
2007-01-04 04:07:33 · answer #9 · answered by Carl P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋