2007-01-03 19:43:53 · 18 answers · asked by neoconammo 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I don't think you understand what liberal means. A classical liberal is for small government and limited spending along with little to no regulations, aka modern day Libertarians. It is a common misconception that liberal refers to democrats. A better word is progressive.
2007-01-03 19:59:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Weird question. We are in a real war here. Not in Iraq but at home. The 2 party system is a joke. We need a new party. It doesn't matter which one goes in. The 'Elites' or scum inbred bankers will still get done what they want. And what they want is war and they couldn't care less about normal people. They have big plans for population reduction. Don't believe me? Well read what Henry Kissinger wrote about in 1974. This is real. See the governments like Iran and Venezuela don't want to play by their rules so they have to go. We have to stop them. The easiest thing we can do is realize the big event that started all the war is 9/11. Well if you watch 'Loose Change 2nd edition' or '911 Mysteries' in full for free on Google Video, and you will wake up and realize they were demolitions. If you know this the rest will follow. Then I recommend listening to the Alex Jones radio show. I recently woke up and I am trying to wake others up too.
2007-01-04 03:53:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why do Conservatives only want to get into Liberal Universities, such as the Ivy League Schools or Michigan or Cal, and not lining up for Liberty or Bob Jones. It must be the fact that Conservatives must need to learn from Liberals in order to get a great Wall Street Job. Who's the smart one now.
2007-01-04 03:50:01 · answer #3 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
intelligence levels lets see!
No abortions that's killing!!
You got pregnant now your going to have to have that baby!
You can't work because you want to go to school to make a better life for you and your child? Tough starve because I don't believe in welfare!!!
Illegal!!!! Lets thow them out etc.
But we need less government! That is less government in Big Business so how do we police these people who are hiring the illegals. Making the Republican owners that much richer???
I dont' think that the intelligence levels need to improve what needs to happen is republicans needs to open their eyes to the entire picture not just the itty bitty picture!!!
2007-01-04 04:28:46 · answer #4 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's interesting -- liberals have the "tax and spend" reputation... but the Republicans are way worse with their "borrow and spend" approach. At least the liberals cover the costs of their programs... the republicans just pass the debt onto our children... and then want credit for lowering taxes. They don't lower them -- they just defer them to the next generation...
2007-01-04 04:05:20 · answer #5 · answered by Kevin F 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You see a lot of educated people lack common sense and vital life skills that are learned over a long period as they have been sheltered by university's and college's because they have not been in the working man's world to experience life in general and it tern this creates a divided community who think the know better than each other.A man buy's a fish in a can and another man takes his or family fishing ,who more educated ? the man who takes his family fishing!
2007-01-04 06:07:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Raise the voting age from 18 to a curve. The voting age should be:
"Voter must have 1) been finished with schooling for 5 years, and 2) have continued in gainful employment after schooling, living in a self supporting fashion outside their parents home for at least 5 years.
"Voters who have at one point met both criteria keep voting privilages if they return to schooling at a later date.
"Academics are forbidden from voting unless they have held gainful employment in another field, not including the entertainment or consulting industries, for 5 years. Entertainers are forbidden from voting during and for 5 years following their careers as entertainers. "
I think that would solve the problem.
2007-01-04 03:56:52 · answer #7 · answered by 0 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your premise seems to be that liberals can't be intelligent, because if they were they would see things as conservatives see them, and live as conservatives live. But that's like saying that people would be better drivers if they failed to signal, got into more accidents and drove around on bald tires.
There. That was good for me. Was it good for you?
2007-01-04 04:08:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Unlike yourself intelligence is not lacking in most of my fellow Liberals, and if you want a taste of reality, walk a mile in their shoes, if you can handle it, which I doubt!
2007-01-04 03:51:38 · answer #9 · answered by ball_courtney 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Until all the young ones learn to master our creator's universal communication system like their grandpa and grandma in planet of apes.
Not at loss and blurr like a desk-top in planet of apes.
All at loss and blurr with our creator's universal gifts of life vital for their own survival and advancement of themselves in planet of apes.
Ever wonder what can a desk-top do with skills in planet of apes?
2007-01-04 04:02:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋