Should voting be A earned right?

Question

Should Voting be a Right that is earned not just given? The idea occured to me that you tend to be more appreciative of things you earn. An example would be after performing X? amount of public service IE; military, civic humanitairian..etc you earn voting privaleges. What do you think?

Not what im Intending Laughing man..Its Everyone enjoys those right but few seem willing to ensure them.

Answer 1

My short answer is no. Here are my thoughts.

From whom would we earn the right? The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States both indicate that our rights are granted to us by God and that it is government's job to protect our rights.

I agree that things earned are often more appreciated than otherwise but I don't believe it is generally so. As an example, I have a great job that I like and I dedicate myself to it, but the main reason I have it is because I was lucky enough to be born in America and so I am a part of a terrific society. I doubt I would be as happy with my life if I had been born in a Kurdish refuge camp and worked hard.

I have a friend that grew up in Israel. He told me that when he turned 18 he entered the military there. It wasn't compulsory. It is simply common understanding there that they have to take part. Along the lines of your question, I wonder why we don't have more of that same feeling in this country.

Answer 2

nicely, this is not a undesirable concept, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that this is easily undertaking to abuse, as we had in Florida in '04 and Ohio to boot. And as for an examination, if the present administration designed it, i'm confident the try questions could be taken from Hannity and Limp-baugh ;-) i could somewhat flow any opposite direction. balloting isn't purely a priviledge, this is a responsiblity. So right this is an concept which will, i'm confident, flow over like a Gospel choir at a KKK assembly. I advise we institute a opposite balloting tax. 5% of the unadjusted gross earnings. on the polling place, you may get carry of a receipt to be related on your own earnings tax to do away with this tax. There could would desire to be exemptions for somewhat some motives yet that would desire to be worked out.There could additionally be effects for states that impede the balloting technique, with a threat removing of the governor if the violations are blatant. the money would desire to be apportioned for issues like Social risk-free practices, guidance, infrastructure, something it somewhat is at present underfunded. you nonetheless be able to vote or not. you purely would desire to pay on your habit. Radical, i be attentive to, yet i'm somewhat enraged by using people who do not vote, and then spend their time complaining approximately their elected representatives. i could additionally upload a "no vote button" for those that sense the suggestions provided are insufficient. that's an concept which will somewhat get the politicians stirred up. do not seek for it in our lifetimes.

Answer 3

I agree with your premise, but disagree with yu examples.

People should have to take a test, administered and designed by me, testing their ability to sort out things that are true from things that have simply been said a lot but are obviously rediculous the first time you hear them. Most of these questions would be non-political in order to prevent bias on my part.

After that I will ask them a series of question, the answer on most people's part should be, "I have no way of knowing, I haven't studied it," but political correctness would lead them to answer otherwise. These will of course have political connotations.

Example, "Are blacks and whites equally capable in matters of athletics and academics?" I don't know. I haven't studied it. Could be some bizarre trick of genetics and time has created a difference. But most people will immediately answer Yes.

"A woman is able to accomplish anything a man can?" Most people answer Yes. Really? Let's have an accuracy of directing urine stream at a distance while standing test.

If they give the PC answer, they are no longer permitted to vote and must leave the country. At that point a logical foreignor will have the chance to take their place by taking the test.


We have just solved the problem of idiot voters and immigration.

Answer 4

Sounds kinda like a Fascist State or Iron Curtain State...forcing people to perform services for the State in order to get a basic right...maybe your idea is not fully thought up. Well intentioned but already tried and failed.

Answer 5

I agree that there should be some kind of accountability.
The late Pres. Ford was a good president and was appointed and not elected. Maybe we should think on those lines instead of elections.

Answer 6

Every natural born and naturalised person is entitled to have the right to vote.

Answer 7

No. You are basically saying that you want to take away our inalienable right to vote. Polling tests were ruled illegal long ago.

Answer 8

Wrong!