Evolution theory is a religion - it has no scientific proof.?

Question

Many very educated Scientists have agreed that evolution has no scientific proof, Do you have scientific proof for evolution religion???
Ok, if you think that you can get a scientific proof for the evolution religion then go to drdino.com give it to them and collect $250,000 from them. But if you don't have the proof, then just stop, relax and look closer at the evidence for Creation Point of View at gorepent.com
- In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. That is the fact, the truth, that is exactly what happened, and there is nothing you can do to go back and change it. You can believe it or not, God still exists and there will be the end of the world, so, Repent while you still can.

Yep, just like I thought, Nobody has any proof, just their mean ignorant opinions.
So, it is true, God Created the Heaven and the Earth and everything that is alive.

evolutionists use circular method to date the fossils and the layer of rock they come from.
They date the fosil by the layer of rock it came from, at the same time they date the rock by what kind of fossils they find in it.
That is just one of the big mistakes that evolutionist keep on making today.

Answer 1

Charles Darwin wrote “To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree. “
(Sourse Book) The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

97% believe in evolution??? Where do you get that statistic from?
This poll was conducted November 18-21, 2004. http://www.cbsnews.com
Americans do not believe that humans evolved, and the vast majority says that even if they evolved, God guided the process. Just 13 percent say that God was not involved. But most would not substitute the teaching of creationism for the teaching of evolution in public schools.
Overall, about two-thirds of Americans want creationism taught along with evolution. Only 37 percent want evolutionism replaced outright.
60 percent of Americans who call themselves Evangelical Christians, however, favor replacing evolution with creationism in schools altogether, as do 50 percent of those who attend religious services every week.
This poll was conducted among a nationwide random sample of 885 adults interviewed by telephone November 18-21, 2004. There were 795 registered voters. The error due to sampling could be plus or minus three percentage points for results based on all adults and all registered voters.

The new lava dome (dacite) from Mount St. Helens was formed in 1986. In 1997 five specimens were taken from this dome at five different locations and subjected to conventional Potassium-Argon dating. The results indicated ages of less than one half to almost three million years old, all from eleven year old rock. We know when this dome formed. When we date rock of known age we test the claims and we see obvious failures. But, when we date rock of unknown age, we are assured that the results are accurate.
(See photograph @ ) http://www.bible.ca/tracks/rapid-layers-mt-st-helens-chart.gif


This unique iron hammer with partially coalified wooden handle was found in Lower Cretaceous Limestone, supposedly 140 million years old (the time of the dinosaurs). According to evolutionary theory, this hammer must have been made by dinosaurs.
(See photograph @ ) http://www.bible.ca/tracks/hammer.jpg

Fossil remains from at least 10 perfectly modern humans (5 males, 4 females, 1 infant) have been excavated fifty feet down from the surface, within the Dakota Sandstone, the same formation found at Dinosaur National Monument, famous for its dinosaurs.
(See photographs @ )
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/malachite-man-1990-articulated-skeleton.jpg
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/malachite-man-1971.jpg
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/malachite-man-1990-leg-knee.jpg


Richard Dawkins, Oxford, an evolutionsis and author of the book, The Blind Watchmaker, said "alleged human bones in the Carboniferous coal deposits. If authenticated as human, these bones would blow the theory of evolution out of the water." (Free Inquiry, V.21, No.4, 10/11/2001)
This small iron pot was imbedded inside a single lump of coal. Such finds are not unusual, but few are fully certified and documented to be true. Here we have a notarized letter certifying the authenticity of the find. This pot is in the Creation Evidences Museum today, in Glen Rose, Texas. (See Photograph at) http://www.bible.ca/tracks/rapid-formation-coal-iron-pot-letter.jpg
One of my personal favorites:
NOVA TV Special, God, Darwin And The Dinosaurs, "...dinosaur footprints, side by side with humans. Finding them would counter evidence that humans evolved long after the dinosaurs became extinct and back up...[the] claim that all species, including man, were created at one time."
Sorry NOVA, but… A series of 14 human footprints with at least 134 dinosaur tracks in the bed of the Paluxy River, near Glen Rose, Texas.
(See Photograph @ ) http://www.bible.ca/tracks/taylor-all-14.jpg

Naturally, evolutionists must explain this away, so they just say, "It is carved."
This picture was photographed under black light to emphasize the detail of the internal structure of the rock.
Internals structures in the rock follow the depressed contour. This track is not carved, it is a large mammal track found with dinosaurs.
(See Photograph @ ) http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks-big-cat-section.jpg

Nope! No scientific evidence at all for creation! As far as using the fact that Earth has vertebrates and invertebrates living together as any type of proof for evolution…um, what’s your point? Genesis 1:24 says “Then God said, ‘Let the earth bring forth living creatures after their kind: cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth after their kind’; and it was so.”
Also what do you mean by “simple” organism in the bottom layer? Do you not understand the complexity of the DNA of a “simple” bacteria that shares 90% of our DNA? Bet you didn’t know that! Oh yeah, and that 1.6% difference between the human and chip. Guess what? That represents 48,000,000 nucleotides. Cystic fibrosis which is always fatal is a mutation of only THREE! Hope this sheds some light on the whole false religion of evolution. Don’t worry, you’ll find the truth…eventually.

Just a side note regarding the tuberculosis bacteria as proof of evolution. Understand that it is STILL A TUBERCULOSIS BACTERIA. As soon as it evolves into a multi-cellular animal that reproduces sexually, then I might consider believing in macro-evolution. Which brings me to another side note: Evolutionist have yet to explain how asexually reproducing animals turned into sexually reproducing animals.

Answer 2

Well, you may have never said or printed the words "Science is a religion" other than to deny them, but you did say that you believe evolution is a religion. As Evolution is science, you believe that part of science is a religion. I seriously doubt that you've read "On the Origin of the Species" by Charles Darwin; let alone with an open mind. Most all of the elements that fundamentalist try to claim as unproved or impossible in Evolution were addressed by this book, yet the same old arguments abound; complex organs and such. The truth is that Evolution is a science that has been studied for a great deal of time, with evidence abounding. The fact that religous folk wish to dismiss the evidence, coming up with creative yet illogical refutations does not diminisht the science. Genetics can show progressions of species. I recall when fundamentalists hailed a scientific finding that showed that all humans are related genetically, suggesting a common ancestor, but they never mention that the same science that showed that is used to show how humans are related to other animals. You simply can't have part without the whole. Either you take science or leave it. If you wish to refute an area of science, do yourself the dignity of discovering the facts of that which you wish to refute.

Answer 3

Fact: 97% of the worlds scientists back Evolution, either natural or theistic.

The "logic" you've implimented here escapes me, quite simply because you haven't used any. You're refuting evolution simply by saying that you prefer the idea that God created everything.

Nobody will ever be able to collect that $250,000 from Dr Dino aka "Dr" Kent Hovind. It's not because there is no evidence for evolution, it's because Hovind isn't talking about giving evidence for evolution (which by the way he changes the meaning of in the small print), he wants proof that there is no possible way that a deity couldn't create the universe. That is an absolutely impossible request to fulfill.

Your circular reasoning comment there, it's a load of bull. Yes, both methods are used, but not on their own. Fossils are only used to roughly estimate how old rock is based on how old other rocks are that contain that fossil. This is not a deciding factor, it is only a guide. And yes, fossils are dated by the rocks, anyone that knows anything about fossils will know why: because 9 out of 10 fossils are made out of the rock they are found it (fossils are imprints left by bone and shell which has slowly rotted away). The rocks are dated using comparative dating methods or using radiometric testing, the fossils alone do not date the rock.

Basically you've made no point here, just the same mindless reaction claims - you've heard it somewhere and you've repeated it. No go read some real science books.

Answer 4

Why must accepting evolution and believing in God be two conflicting things? What if underneath the observable universe is the changless, the infinite, and the undivided? We can call that God.

There is no scientific proof that there is a God like the Christian God. That God says, "Do unto others as you would have done to you." He also says, "If you're bad, you'll go to hell." These statements together are hypocritical.

And every living being experiences God in our own personal way while we're alive.

Our genes have taught us to survive in the midst of evolution, by using our senses. Now what can we do to learn to see past the observable reality to what is truly underneath it?

Answer 5

Anyone with the slightest intelligence can read Dr. Dino's rules for collecting the $250,000 are set up to never happen. First, he re-writes the definition of evolution, then expects that definition to be proven. Then he wants a whole bunch of other stuff that doesn't have anything to do with evolution. Then he wasts God disproven. This is of course impossible, because any evidence you present can be countered with "God just made it that way".

You want proof of evolution? Try researching the tuberculosis bacteria. Here's a hint: bacterias and viruses have evolved to become immune to our previous treatments.

Answer 6

I have a theory. There is no evolution, creationism, intelligent design or anything like that. Life on this planet began 67 years ago when aliens wanted a new TV show to pass the time. The producers called it "Earth" and provided the "stars" with everything from fake fossil and historical records to a hairbrained scheme called "religion" to make the show more entertaining. Now disprove my theory.

Answer 7

I believe in creationism. But what you said is what I've been saying for ages on this site. Nor is there any proof for the big bang theory. I think that people are entitled to believe what they want, but don't try to say that its based on absolute fact and don't put us Creationist down because it makes more sense to us that all of this was planned by an thinking entity and not just a happy cosmic accident that took thousands of years to occur.

Answer 8

Evolution the theory supports Evolution the fact. The latter being a PROVEN process that 97% (or more) of scientists WORLDWIDE agree on.

It is not up for debate if Evolution is false.

If you try to disprove it (heh... good luck) then you might as well try to disprove gravity.

There is ZERO evidence for Creationism let alone Intelligent Design.

Answer 9

It is a theory. A very plausible theory, with evidence to support it.

Creationism is not.

Does your religion teach you to say things like "Repent while you still can?" If so, why would I want to buy into it? I don't believe that God exists, I don't believe in Creationism, and I have nothing to repent.

Answer 10

If you think that there is no proof for evolution then I will have to assume that you are only reading and listening to the things that your preacher or minister or priest etc. approves of. Extend your area of research and you will learn much. You sound young. There may be hope for you yet.

Answer 11

Either way, were all killing each other over it. Lets just be at peace. It doesnt matter if someone puts the butter on the underside of their toast.