Though I'm not a supporter of punishing a person because of their beliefs he knew what he was getting into when he joined the military. He knew the consequences for refusing service and should expect to be prosecuted. Hopefully the punishment fits the crime, though, and he isn't given too severe of a sentence. I have many friends who have been deployed to Iraq or Afghan. who have seen people that don't want to be there. People who don't want to go are emotionally displaced and pose a serious threat to themselves and their comrades.
2007-01-03 18:42:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jason 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
in this 0-4's article 39 listening to, relatively some his case could have been divulged. decrease than identify of UCMJ. the object 39, is the precursor to the going to trial. If there replaced into not sufficent data to help this O-4's declare. this would not be going to protection stress trial. I easily have sat in on some article 39 hearings, this could be a interesting trial. alongside with the Trial in Santa Clara Cal, Re Obamas and his eligability. decide Carter there, is going to take this concern all the way. could it merely be the previous addage is going again actual, the place there is smoke there is often hearth,
2016-10-19 10:56:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
True enough. You can refuse to follow an unlawful order in the performance of your duty as a soldier, but you damn sure better be correct and be able to prove it was unlawful. Refusing to obey a deployment order could never be construed as such.
2007-01-03 18:43:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes, i am well aware that after taking the oath any member of the Armed Forces has to follow legal orders. So any member canot refuse a legally ordered deployment. You are incorrect to say that a military member cannot refuse deployment. You do, if it was not ordered or if it was ordered illegally.
2007-01-03 18:39:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Charles D 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
If you don't recognize this excerpt, it's from the Declaration of Independence. Notice the part about the people having "the right" to overthrow the government and replace it with a better one?
2007-01-03 18:43:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by rawlings12345 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Im just glad we caught this coward in the states and not in the sandbox with tracers flying. This POS could have been my Platoon leader or worse one of My buddies Platoon leaders. Far better we gett rid of um here. Think my friends at Levanworth will give him a pleasant 6 years. I mean really WTF does the army do? its not a secret. been the same job for thousands of years.
2007-01-03 19:45:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by horgurce 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Once you join the ARMY, you are their property. You eat and breathe and sleep ARMY. My husband was in for 20 years and he knows.
He must be arrested and dealt with harshly. What a poor example!
2007-01-03 18:37:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tenn Gal 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
A soldier is REQUIRED to refuse an illegal order.
An order deploying someone to an illegal war is itself illegal.
2007-01-03 19:15:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by bettysdad 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
that is true ... have you ever thought about what the term G.I. means? ... Government Issued .. meaning you are now Government property.
2007-01-03 18:47:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by saab374 2
·
0⤊
1⤋