English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

up for misleading the public, and if so would you support a petition to send him to trial?

2007-01-03 17:33:11 · 17 answers · asked by rascoe627 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

17 answers

Won't happen in the U.S.

When Clinton was impeached, the Democrats in the Senate announced prior to his trial that they would never convict him.

Now that the Senate is so close to 50/50 Democrat and Republican, even if impeached, he would not be convicted. Perhaps the House should impeach him any how.

International charges are in the works, which is why there is a bolt-hole for the bush-league under construction at your expense in Paraguay in the heart of the nazi refuge.

2007-01-03 17:35:21 · answer #1 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 3 1

I'll agree to criminal charges against Bush if you'll agree to criminal charges against Sarah Brady and everybody else that lied about banning guns making us safer. Oh, didn't that work real good in Washington, D.C.? The murder rate tripled and it held the U.S. record for 15 of the last 18 years.

2007-01-03 17:55:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I definitely do not support the war at all, nor do I support our so-called President. However, I do support our troops, because they are just doing their job that they were commanded to do.

Yes, criminal charges should be brought against him and he should be on trial for it. So many men and women lost their lives for what?? Because Bush wants to control their oil? I think that our attention should have been focused on Osama. They should have killed him when they had him in arms reach.

I would definitely support the petition.....just show me where to sign.....

2007-01-03 17:40:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Very Angry in response to your first question.

No to your second, at least not at this time. The Country is still too divided on too many issues, and too many people are voting on what their Priests and Ministers, Rabi's and Imam's tell them to.

And, even though I expect this answer to get tanked I will also say that if we need a Greater Power to guide us..........well it may be too late for us. I am not dissing Faith. I think Faith is a very Good thing, but it should be personal and quite seperate from partisan politics.

I watch the power that Faith's Corrupt. I see their influence every day. We look down on other countries that become divided by their Faiths while we don't seem to notice our own.

Nero fiddled while Rome burned.

Remember Watergate? Remember Monica? We got absolutely nothing accomplished beyond getting one Crook and one Sex addict out of office. The country was not greatly served in either case.

We haven't the time to give the Media the gift of Impeachment.........We have our Nations Best and Bravest sitting in the middle of a Civil War our Government still denies exists, and now Bush wan'ts us to "sacrifce" More.

Id just like to remind our Shrub and Chief, women serve in the military in nearly every capacity men do, is he ready to send his daughters to Iraq?????

I ask this of every Bush supporter.....If the draft is reinstated.....will your child serve? Will they go where Bush so easily sends other people's children? Are you willing to "Sacrifice" YOUR child?

2007-01-03 17:53:29 · answer #4 · answered by Norton N 5 · 0 3

Bush is father of all terrorist, then how come he will be under criminal charge.

I feel that American public are so powerless, helpless and stupid (why not check your father Mr. Bush IQ) that they have chosen world biggest terrorist as their father and cannot even change him. How I will believe that there is so called DEMOCRACY and LIBERTY in US.

The world cannot deny the fact that American people have equal share in the terrorism and harm they have done to the world by support biggest Satan and terrorist. Soon you will see the consequences, don’t worry.

2007-01-03 17:52:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

How quickly human beings overlook. back whilst the probable of conflict in Iraq grew to become into increasing, the controversy grew to become into in no way on despite if or no longer Iraq had WMDs. purely approximately each and every u . s . in the worldwide grew to become into in contract that Iraq did. the controversy grew to become into on despite if or no longer continued inspections would get the activity accomplished in looking them. The worldwide places against the conflict have been against it because of the fact they felt that militia action grew to become into no longer needed. They felt that inspections have been working and could prevail in looking the WMDs in question. nicely that and that they have got been all getting paychecks from Saddam's exploitation of the oil for foodstuff application, yet it quite is an entire diverse subject count. a extra constructive question is that if Iraq now no longer had any WMDs why did no longer cooperate extra and push for quicker inspections to get it over with and get sanctions lifted. somewhat they continued to ward off and intervene with inspections. except Saddam basically needed human beings to think of that Iraq nonetheless had WMDs with a view to grant himself the sensation of extra skill.

2016-10-29 23:09:30 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

they wouldnever send the president to jail n he wasn't the onlyone to choose to go to war the senate and house of reps have to vote on it to go anyway this is why i hate how people go and blame bush if anyhting he should be comended later after the war for taking the blame for the mistake by our government to go to war although they voted to go to war with afghanistan not iraq and in war time the president doesnt have to wait for congress he can do anything he want

2007-01-03 17:46:51 · answer #7 · answered by answerman 2 · 0 3

yes Bush is a crimminal

he's responsible for the 9/11 attacks

2007-01-03 17:36:14 · answer #8 · answered by lovefights 3 · 2 4

No. I was all grown up when all this started... Lots of people were involved with the decision, other world leaders, Democrats...
Go back and catch up on your history.

2007-01-03 17:47:40 · answer #9 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0 3

I don't think that you can put someone on trial for lying when they are not under oath. Still, he's gross.

2007-01-03 17:40:50 · answer #10 · answered by D.A.L. 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers