No ******* way. In fact since when do people wanna vote for celebrities. I mean those fools have lower IQs than rocks, it's pathetic.
2007-01-03 17:18:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton supported the conflict in Iraq and does not ask for forgiveness for it. She is likewise urging the president to shelter Iran. bill Clinton became insisting on invading Iraq whilst they kicked out the inspectors whilst adequate anthrax became discovered to kill the international 12 circumstances over.His advisors wouldnt enable it simply by him dropping his acceptance so he left it as much as the subsequent regime. As reported by technique of 60 minutes, interior the 90s warehouses have been outfitted by using the u . s . with anthrax vaccines ect and Clinton even reported terrorist assaults have been inevitable. maximum politicans, coated Kerry knew those information and is why they supported the conflict. we are positioned into an inevitable, undesired subject by technique of the "loopy people" of the international, and that is getting extra severe than you already know. If she is president there'll nevertheless be a conflict on terror, yet she might fluff up the entitlement courses and we'd even see gay marriage legalized if she gets a democratic Senate. not a lot else will substitute. the producing jobs will nevertheless visit China which started interior the 90s whilst bill became president.
2016-12-15 15:19:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by kemmer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
well I am old enough to vote and I would vote for her in split second. But I am actually on the John Edwards bandwagon and I really would like him to be the candidate in 08. Hillary hasn't said she is running and I really think it is too much too soon for Barack Obama, though I like him.
2007-01-03 17:42:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by otisisstumpy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary Clinton?
Decidedly no.
I'd vote for Condi, though, so it's not the female thing either: it's that Hillary's so lefty that normal Demorats look moderate. She makes Obama look like a good candidate. Hey, she makes Howard Dean look like a good candidate.
2007-01-03 17:34:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by meandlisa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that I would vote for her if she is nominated. I think that she would do a good job.
I really like John Edwards better and hope that he gets the nomination.
I just don't think that I could vote for Obama. The only reason I can give for that is, I just have this gut feeling that says no.
2007-01-03 17:34:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by real deal 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Only if Oboma didn't run. You have a strong opinion for someone who's opinion doesn't legally count. I don't know your reasons, but I can say we would probably be in a better position with her as president then we are, and have been, with Bush.
2007-01-03 17:19:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by bown 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd give her the benefit of the doubt. She didn't do anything wrong. Her husband did. Why not vote for her? Scared that's she's a woman?
2007-01-03 17:19:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by gone 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Depends on her stand on several issues, however, i do not consider it an issue that she is a woman. I bet she can still do better than bush regardless of whether she is a woman, a caveman, or a taliban
2007-01-03 18:09:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by myFEARisALIEN! 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes. Here is why...If she screws up that much we can impeach her. Plus I would like to see history made with the first women president.
2007-01-03 20:28:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by jipp 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
if i was old enough 2 vote i would
2007-01-03 17:17:34
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋