2007-01-03 16:12:43 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I've never heard a punkbitch squeal so loud for a measly ten points, so here you go old man. I hope when you fell off that truck while drunk on duty that you didn't hurt your mouth. I know how passionate you are about giving head and rimjobs. Housebound invalid chained to a PC? Where's your wife
Wow, I must have really gotten under your skin for you to respond to me like this. Funny you are the punk that doesn't allow email. Back to the gloryhole for you gayboi
2007-01-03 23:33:33 · answer #1 · answered by netnazivictim 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A modified version of the FDA should be instituted in place of the current system. They should enforce regulations that require food and drug companies to properly and truthfully label all their products, as well as provide objective information on all the chemicals and foods produced and used in the US. Deregulation would just encourage corporations to screw over the consumer, and we'd have even crappier products with zero quality control and no legal recourse for injured citizens against the food/drug companies.
2007-01-03 16:19:46 · answer #2 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Considering the fact that doctors aren't even in charge of the F.D.A, I'm going to have to say yes, but food and drugs should not go unregulated. Hopefully the market will do that in the F.D.A's absence; self regulation is the best regulation.
2007-01-03 16:21:06 · answer #3 · answered by chris 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think you have the definitions mixed up. If FDA was liberal, they would have less restrictions. For this reason, the FDA is considered a conservative agency.
2007-01-03 16:19:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
in case you knew something approximately milk or perhaps farming you will understand . They acted to guard us from production facility farms , no longer Grandma who served uncooked milk with strawberries . Milk a cow some day yet beware for the tail ..
2016-10-29 23:03:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The FDA has already been gutted by the neocons. It's a moot point.
2007-01-03 16:16:18 · answer #6 · answered by jhartmann21 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
yes.
Or it should be heavily restricted to actually serving the purpose it's supposed to (the public interest and safety), without being controlled by financial interests like the Pharmacuetical Industry.
2007-01-03 16:37:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As frustrated with them as I am, I do feel they provide important services and life saving information.
2007-01-03 16:16:32 · answer #8 · answered by howdigethere 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not! I think they should be more involved in the regulation of so-called diet suppliments.
2007-01-03 16:17:53 · answer #9 · answered by DavidNH 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sure...a little e coli never hurt anyone.
2007-01-03 16:16:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋