B. "Hussein" Obama was against stopping the genocidal despot, Butcher of Baghdad, Saddam "Hussein", from continuing to kill over 500,000 (Half-million) people--is this the Liberal's new leader? Would today's Liberals have rolled over for Hitler too? Do you think his judgement was affected by his admitted cocaine use and chronic skunk weed nickle bag toking (or blunts or w/e)?
2007-01-03
16:07:20
·
14 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Look at this intellectual midget "eatmore's" response. It says it all--Liberals now make the claim that judgments made on cocaine are just as sound, on average, as judgments made while sober. This loser is Exhibit "A" of the typical, uneducated, bedwetting Liberal Democrat.
2007-01-03
16:20:50 ·
update #1
Everyone look at this little rapper wannabe G. He struggles to write a complete sentence. I guess they didn't have Strunk & White, "Elements of Style" in Compton. You have to love humiliating these urine soaked beasts.
2007-01-03
16:30:10 ·
update #2
Yes, yes, I'm referring to this little beligerent homie-slice Bow Wow. What a tool. LOL.
2007-01-03
16:31:36 ·
update #3
As to this nitwit Elway, I'm sure she's also a summa *** laude graduate from the nation's best university, and a fellow Mensa member. Are you kidding me? I could intellectually mug you if I had brain cancer and 105 degree fever. Get in the game.
2007-01-03
18:16:42 ·
update #4
It's really cute how you continue to use the word "liberal" like the derogatory term it is without realizing that the idiots in your party are all closet liberals too.
If you're lucky, someday you'll understand that conservativism and the modern Republican Party are mutually exclusive.
2007-01-03 16:16:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Edward S 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Ever because of the fact the vogue has been to call him Barack Hussein Obama (or B. Hussein Obama for the super-crazies), i've got been touching on all people huge political chief by skill of their complete call, considering the fact that i assume that's what we are meant to do. it is humorous whilst human beings attempt to decide who G. Walker and R. Bruce are. it is so ridiculous.
2016-10-29 23:02:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here is the biggest problem with your comment:
March 19, 2003, Bush gave orders to invade Iraq.
Saddam Captured December 14, 2003
November 7th, 2004 Barack Obama is the third African American ever elected to the United States Senate, sworn into ofice in 2005.
so i guess the answer to your question is....Obama wasn't in office yet!
2007-01-03 18:07:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by qncyguy21 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Wow you are something....what are you GW's personal crackwhore? You say alot about Obama but nothing of the man who stutters on "subliminal"! The man is a buffoon! He did drugs, is a drunk and only got elected by his daddy and his brother. How can you be clouded by facts? You have you head shoven so far up GW's @ss that you can see the "1000 points of light"! Wasn't the original reason of GW starting a war to get his hands on Osama Bin Laden??? Where the fcuk is he??? The genocide of WTC....TWICE! YOU are the one who needs to lay off the crack pipe! Wake up C U Next Tuesday!
You are the reason that most animals eat their young!
2007-01-03 16:26:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by sixfoot8bkr 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I see you really get off on insulting people, so let's get to it. Your use of his middle name is a very telling flame tool. It tells us that you are childish enough to use playground tactics, yet have a rudimentary intelligence that allows you to colorfully verbalize your insipid rage. You post flame questions to get reactions you can vent your spleen on by attacking the answerers in turn. Flame on, perhaps someday you can channel that rage into more positive areas, such as attending college and learning common civility. I won't bother to return to see what I'm sure will be a stunningly visceral retort. On to serious questioners...
2007-01-03 17:20:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Barack Obama can now distance himself from all other serious Democratic presidential contenders by saying that he never supported the war in Iraq. While Clinton and Kerry attack Bush on the war, they can not hide the fact that they voted for it. By questioning Bush's judgement on the war, they are also questioning their own judgement. The fact is that liberals are ready to thow in the towel in Iraq - Obama knows this and can make the "I told you so" claim when Clinton and Kerry can't.
2007-01-04 11:27:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ben 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why aren't we invading China for human rights violations? Why not invade North Korea? Why not invade every dictatorship on Earth and institute our version of democracy? FORCED DEMOCRACY WILL NOT WORK. THE PEOPLE OF A COUNTRY MUST COLLECTIVELY RISE UP ON THEIR OWN AND FORCE THE TYRANNICAL GOVERNMENTS TO SUBMIT TO THEIR WILL. Recreational drug use within the bounds of responsible moderation and respect for other people's rights is perfectly fine. Alcohol abusers and flat-sober people have crap judgment, too. Are you going to call for an end to alcohol and sobriety as well? Get your head from your one-way digestive tract, kid.
2007-01-03 16:16:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
You are sick, Barak Obama is barly liberal. He is a watered down version. A sick democrat. I would be like calling George W. an American or intelligent. So get your facts straight. And drawing out the Hussein thing makes you ignorant.
2007-01-03 16:16:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Stozzz 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
EDIT: Don't you feel ashamed that the best you can do is to give me thumbs down when you can't even answer my question?
Hey Jessica, you must really hate genocidal dictators. Why don't we go stop the ruthless and genocidal dictators of Syria, Iran, Yemen, Dubai, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, North Korea, and the many others?? Many of them are worse than Saddam ever was, but you probably don't care. HYPOCRITE!!!
2007-01-03 16:13:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Jessica...your hatred of Obama does it stem from your hatred of his ideas or does his skin color really concern you that he may be a viable candidate for the White House. You seem a little obsessed with this guy and you seem to be making an extra effort in discrediting him.
2007-01-03 16:15:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5
·
3⤊
0⤋