After Napoleon, Hitler and Saddam is it not proof enough that military power corrupts and finally both?

Question

It finishes the power and the holder both.

Answer 1

It is an interesting question. But would you please re-post it after editing, to make the meaning more clear.

Answer 2

Power corrupts and destroys the power and holder. These men were some of the greatest salemen who tricked gullible people. The trouble is the people.

Answer 3

Nope. check out Spain under Franco. He grew to become right into a militia dictator on top of problems with Spain for some years and slowly transferred it from a Facist government right into a blooming democracy. Franca grew to become into in no way corrupted by skill of skill. additionally, Cuba's Castro. He has had militia administration of that u . s . for better than 0.5 a century. i assume you will desire to argue despite if or no longer he's corrupted by skill of skill or no longer. His purely undoing would be age. Russia's Stalin grew to become into corrupted by skill of skill, yet he additionally gave up the ghost peacefully in no way figuring out to purchase his crimes. those are cutting-side examples, yet you may make comparable arguments for the Alexander the great, British Empire, historic Rome's Casears and China's Dynasties. while you're a romantic, i think of you assertion makes diverse experience. in spite of the incontrovertible fact that, in case you prepare it to historic previous, i think of you will discover its no longer continuously the case. great question.

Answer 4

Dude, you're not a very articulate philosopher. I appreciate your attempt to construct a modified version of Lord Acton's Maxim, but you failed miserably.

Answer 5

You forgot Stalin. He killed more people. Though Mao had a multi-million hit-list too.

Answer 6

Jesus said - "He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword."

Answer 7

finally both?
??????