Your doctor will have the statistics on that. I believe it's a 50-50 chance at even becoming prego after they reverse it.
2007-01-03 15:46:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by nashiranickel 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a less than 1% chance of getting pregnant if your tubes are tied. There are procedures to reverse a tubiligation, but it's only about a 50% chance of getting pregnant even then.
2007-01-03 15:48:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by Melissa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ask a doctor about IVF or tubal reversal if you want to become pregnant.
However, if you are asking about the possibility of pregnancy WITHOUT those options.... The rate of pregnancy after a tubal ligation ranges from about 1-5 out of a thousand women, depending on the type of procedure and the age you were when it was done. AND out of those few women who DO get pregnant, about 1/3 of them are ectopic.
Sooo, your chances are far less than even 1 % that you will have a healthy normal pregnancy without other interventions.
2007-01-03 15:47:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jilly 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If your tubes are tied you are not going to have a pregnancy!!
2007-01-03 15:45:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by ruthie 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
FIRST OF ALL IF YOUR TUBES ARE TIED THEIR IS A CHANCE YOU CAN GET PREGNANT. SECOND IF YOU GET PREGNANT YOU CAN HAVE A NORMAL PREGNANCY. THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN GRANTEE YOU WON'T BECOME PREGNANT IS NO SEX OR HAVING A HYSTERECTOMY.
2007-01-03 15:57:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by jenn_burks311 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ummm when you get your tubes tied. that mainly prevents pregnancy from ever accuring. sorry for your luck
2007-01-03 15:47:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michila Noell 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
you can have a normal pregnancy through IVF easily, as the tubes are not involved.
2007-01-03 15:46:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
UM!!!! If your tubes are tied you cant get pregnant!
2007-01-03 15:49:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by missjewl 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
DEAR SO SORRY YOU CAN NOT YOU HAVE TO HAVE THEM UNTIED TO GET THAT WAY SO SORRY NO GO
2007-01-03 15:46:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
not good odds
2007-01-03 15:59:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by klunk 4
·
0⤊
0⤋