2007-01-03 15:42:00 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They will say Gerald Ford's, but a careful compilation of posts over the last few weeks will show it is Saddam's.
2007-01-03 15:44:57 · answer #1 · answered by WJ 7 · 2⤊ 6⤋
I would hope more were sorrowful over President Ford's. At the very least, he's a fellow American. At the very most, he never committed any of the heinous crimes of Hussein. So anyone who would choose to be more upset by the death of Hussein than of Ford, should perhaps consider relinquishing their US citizenship for a new home in Iraq. Or anyplace else but here, for that matter.
2007-01-03 15:54:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The lack of life of Gerald Ford made me extra unhappy, because he served his usa (and mine) nicely, yet he change into ninety 3, so it extremely change into his time. The lack of life of Saddam Hussein made me extra irritating. I received't waste tears over him, because he change right into a brutal tyrant, yet i'm worried about the way his trial and execution were dealt with--tried by a authorities that did not even exist on the time of his crimes, and then taunted on the gallows. I recommend, he's in all likelihood responsible of all that he change into convicted of and extra, inspite of the indisputable fact that the way of his trial and execution change into extra like a vendetta than actual justice, and that i'm afraid which will extra enflame a usa it truly is already in flames, with a view to talk.
2016-12-01 19:26:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liberals loved Gerald Ford. He voiced his opinion without having political handlers deliver one liners for him. He stated referring to Nixon..."If you have an enemies list...than you have to many enemies." Him and his wife created a clinic that kept our Hollywood liberal Buddies clean from drug addiction. He kicked Azz on the Football Field in Ann Arbor (liberal capital of the Midwest) Lastly any person who was drawn on an Episode of the Simpsons is greater achievement than anyone has performed on Yahoo Answers. This liberal says that Saddam could even carry Gerald Ford's duffel bag.
2007-01-03 15:50:57 · answer #4 · answered by Laughing Man Copycat 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What a stupid question. Doesn't even deserve an answer other than to say liberals had no use for Saddam either, but was his death worth over 3,000 American lives?
2007-01-03 16:25:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well Ford of course! He was the last moderate republican president! He was pro-choice! His wife took a very active role in the women's movement!
2007-01-03 16:25:04 · answer #6 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since they like to place blame whenever possible they will act as if it is too bad that Saddam was killed by President Bush.
2007-01-03 15:48:34 · answer #7 · answered by Pete 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Neither, sorry to let you down. Tell me why did the republican war mongerer Charles Krauthammer say this about Sadaam's execution?
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/01/03/charles-krauthammer-says-the-us-will-suffer-because-of-saddams-execution/
2007-01-03 15:47:02 · answer #8 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Saddam's.
2007-01-03 15:46:01 · answer #9 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
C'mon. don't be ridculous. I'm sure all liberals were sadden by Ford's death.
2007-01-03 15:56:53 · answer #10 · answered by GOP - Going Out of Power 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋