what the people think and want is of no consequence ... or havent u noticed that yet ... or maybe u think all the "terror" legislation is to fight some mythical enemy in the desert halfway around the world ... no, its to keep the people from having a voice or the ability to rise up and say no to american imperialism for financial gain for the elite ...
2007-01-03 15:12:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
7⤋
Has the Islamic upward thrust in militancy and anti-American sentiment raised on condition that we took out between the only SECULAR regimes (Saddam's) in modern middle jap heritage? Have the international locations around Iraq unduly motivated Iraqi violence on condition that there's no relatively form of government there? Have the a million,000,000 ineffective Iraqis that's composed of 500,000 toddlers surpass Bush's loss of existence toll? definite.
2016-10-19 10:45:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
My God - is there no limit to the gullibility of those dedicated Libs. So Hallyburton is owned by Bin Laden and we have been paying him to rebuild Irak. Wow - that`s really heavy. Do you have a shread of evidence to prove any of this or are you just blowing smoke? Always good to find a question that shows some really deep thinking.
2007-01-03 16:11:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by hironymus 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Where is your proof that shows a connection between Halliburton, and Bin Laden? You don't have any just like every other Lib on here. We can't leave Iraq, and we're not going to, so can it. If we left Iraq the terrorists would take over. Terrorism would spread over here in the U.S. and we'd be fighting them here in our front yards. Hey Einstein, Halliburton has everyday Joes working for it, and they're the ones that benefit the most from every contract, but you dumb dumbs never stop to think about the hard workers that make Halliburton tick!
2007-01-03 15:15:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
Hey Chef Boy!
If it were only this simple.
Has it occurred to you that maybe one of the only ways our government leaders can eliminate the American population is through wars, abortion, drugs, alcohol, chem-trails in the sky?
Our government has never wanted to protect us and if you actually believe our government wants to protect us, well then I guess you missed what happened to 3000+ American citizens on September 11, 2001.
Here are some links below you can go to for more information on what is really happening to our nation, or freedoms and rights.
Hope this helps you................ : -O
2007-01-03 17:19:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well you have two questions here.
A) End of Iraq War. That's a tough answer. It may seem easy to pull out, but we screwed that country up. Now if we leave the violence is going to escalate. There is no quick fix to Iraq and the Bush Admin should have realized that before they went in. Right or wrong, we now owe to the Iraqis to stay and try to "fix" things.
B) Bush Incompetence. The Dems have Congress, so hopefully we will finally see some action on this. When the Repubs had it, they could dictate policy. With the Dems in charge hopefully the US can finally investigate this topic completely and set up measures that this does not happen again. I doubt anyone will face criminal charges, but we need to stop this from happening ever again. History will at least shame those responsible for this mess.
2007-01-03 15:15:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by I like Chinese food 4
·
3⤊
6⤋
Its rediculous to imply that the fracas in Iraq is about monetary
gain of private companies. It has cost us lives and money, so
what are you talking about ? I think that you have not been
paying attention. Sadam was a threat to the world as well as
his own people and all sensible Iraqis are very happy that we
are there. People in the rest of the world, like the French,etc.
should have been there with us as they will benefit even more
than us, except for their little private money making schemes.
2007-01-03 15:23:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
What truly bothers me is that our country is so divided on this issue. This is the biggest failure of our President (and I have supported him in the past). I truly believe we need to be strengthening our borders here in the U.S. ... not out running around in a country that could care less about our being there. I wish we would all stop bashing each other and instead start asking for answers and a productive outcome.
2007-01-03 15:17:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by mJc 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
Its the politicians that mint the money,, so they are at it..!!
The people can do the rest - whether be it fighting, having had,
etc...
Even Vietnam was RIGHT at the time, only later it changed - so what the deal with the Perceptionnnn..!??
2007-01-03 15:26:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sid Has 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
America has been "Had" because 9/11 was a false flag attack (self-inflicted wound) and there is no war on terror, just a lying president who wants you to think the war exists so he can give your tax money to his cronies and Haliburton without them even having to bid on the contract. See how corrupt politics works? search 9/11 truth
2007-01-03 15:23:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by protocols 2
·
0⤊
4⤋
I love these guys who talk about the war on terror like there's some clear and definable context and finish line. The "War on terror" is like "The war on drugs" or the "War on poverty" or the "War on immorality". It's an abstraction without parameters, without a regulated or definable process. It's just a free-floating conflict without resolution.
And folks... that's exactly what it's supposed to be. It's not about terrorism. It's about a faceless enemy that can be called upon whenever a faceless enemy is needed.
2007-01-03 15:22:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋