Has anyone else felt a difference between intercourse with a circumcised guy and one is is not?

Answer 1

Yes, sex is more pleasurable if the man is circumcised.


Most women prefer a man with a circumcised penis because it may move inside them in a less friction-based manner. Once he is inside the vagina, the circumcised penis may easily slide up and down to create pleasure for both partners.

There are several advantages for circumcised men when it comes to sexuality. First is that circumcised male have no need to worry about daily cleansing of his foreskin. Meanwhile, men with an uncircumcised foreskin must take special care to move it up and down and clean it inside its covered areas to avoid odors or serious infection because of material buildup. Consequently, there might be some bacteria and germs that could surface thus affect their sexual health.

Safe sex is an added concern for uncircumcised men and their partners. Men with foreskins occasionally have difficulty finding the right condom or keeping one on during penetrative sexual activity. That spells trouble in bed as well as generates unneeded anxiety.

As for the sensitivity of the penis, no medical or physiological study has proved that circumcision reduces sensitivity, opposed to common belief. It is completely FALSE that circumcision reduces penis sensitivity. The American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) confirms this on their web site; have a look at: http://www.aap.org/pubed/zzzjzmemh4c.htm

Several studies carried out by prestigious research bodies have concluded that uncircumcised penises are more prone to infections and contraction of STD's, including AIDS-HIV. Circumcised men have been proved to be up 70% less likely to be infected than those who are uncircumcised. Have a look at this site: http://www.torontodailynews.com/index.php/HealthNews/2006121404Circumcision

As for women, studies also show that circumcision also protects female partners from AIDS-HIV and other STD's. Browse this article: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2006/02_08_06.html

Circumcision is an easy and nowadays painless procedure, which has many benefits, and virtually no risks.

Answer 2

It's a myth that all uncircumcised guys have a foul odor. The truth is, all male and female genitals, whether circumcised or uncircumcised, shed dead skin cells and will smell if not cleaned properly and daily.

I've been with both circumcised and uncircumcised men. On general principal, I prefer an uncircumcised penis because it's in it's natural state. But I think technique has more to do with it than if it's cut or not. Once the action got started, there wasn't much difference between circed and uncircumcised partners other than the circumcised men have to thrust a little harder because they are less sensitive due to the cutting and scarring (this per men & what I've read - since I'm a woman I can't speak personally as to what they feel). But I couldn't feel a difference internally and the penis status had nothing to do with orgasm or lasting power, etc.
I've also heard that you'd require more lubricant with men who are cut because they don't have the gliding "sheath" aka foreskin.
Hope that helps some.

Answer 3

The natural penis is designed by nature to maximize the sexual pleasure for the woman, as well as the man, during intercourse.

Conversely, circumcised sex is known to harm women in at least
10 ways: http://sexasnatureintendedit.com/10f/1ho...

If a woman takes a few minutes to check out the above website and see what the differences are between circumcised sex and natural sex, she'll know exactly what to look for, and be able to make her own a clear judgments. She won't have to rely on the opinions of others, which are often posted by circumucised men (just defending their surgically altered penis), who are not qualified to speak from the women's point of view.

And these posts can also come from women who have not had the comparative experience of sex with both types of penises, but feel they must defend the circumcised norm (which is all they are familiar with), especially if they circumcised their son(s).

-------

Answer 4

definite I easily have felt a difference. i think that the pinnacle of an uncircumcised penis gets greater suitable the greater excited he will become. I easily have not felt this with circumcised men nonetheless. They in all probability do besides yet i've got felt it truly is greater marked, and subsequently feels greater efficient with an uncircumcised one.

Answer 5

A woman would not be able to tell the difference. Remember, the vagina is an incredibly elastic organ that can open easily stretch enough to deliver a baby's head. And, thanks to Mother Nature/God there are very few nerve endings inside along the vaginal wall. It's kind of like condoms that have "raised pleasure dots for her". I don't think guys have figured out we can't feel those in our vaginas either!!

Answer 6

Yes, I've been with both, and natural is soooooo much better! For starters, the cut guy's head was dry and harsh against my insides, so we had to use a lot of lube. The uncut penis is silky and glides smoothly - very sensual. But the worst with the cut man was that he usually could not climax with sex with me. He'd have to pull out and finish by hand because of the reduced sensitivity in his mutilated penis. I hated that. I am extremely glad my husband's parents went against the then-fashion and left him WHOLE.

Answer 7

I have not noticed a difference in the two. Have never noticed a foul odor either. If there is a foul odor its probably because they dont keep themselves clean and got an infection.

Answer 8

I've not felt a difference...my hubby is uncircumcised and he's SUPER sensitive after orgasm because the foreskin is pulled back, revealing the head. I've not noticed a foul odor, but maybe that's because he's extra clean down there. :)

Answer 9

A MAN THAT HAS NOT BEEN CIRCUMSIZED HAS AN FOUL ODOR IN THE FORE SKIN BUT I GUESS THEY ALL WORK SAME AS FAR AS GETTING THE JOB DONE

Answer 10

yes of course read these.