Incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi is proposing legislation that will violate the First Amendment of the Constitution by limiting or restricting the free speech of American Citizens
2007-01-03 13:02:35 · 11 answers · asked by m c 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
She's just laying the groundwork for when the Comrade Clinton Regime comes to power. Socialism is on its way.
2007-01-03 13:11:36 · answer #1 · answered by infidel-louie 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Free speech has always been a constitutional ideal here in America, but it has never been absolute. The operant term is "protected speech." Slander is not protected speech. Inciting to riot is not protected speech. Publication with malice or reckless disregard for the truth is not protected speech. Public figures are shielded less than private citizens, so critical speech about public figures is more likely to be protected than that against private citizens.
2007-01-03 13:14:33 · answer #2 · answered by bullwinkle 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think that despite its abuses ( people using it as a tool maliciously ) it needs to be maintained.
The most basic rights have to be pure.
As far as this amendment nancy is proposing... do you have some source or reference? I cant stand Nancy but cant say anything bad about her that might not be true.
2007-01-03 13:18:33 · answer #3 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
loose speech ought to stay only that loose, no count number how objectionable it somewhat is. human beings ought to have the final to voice their ideas no count number in case you like it or no longer. I hate the assumption of political correctness and could bypass out of my thank you to forget approximately it, if I offend anybody i do no longer care enable them to be indignant. as long as i'm no longer threatening to kill or inflicting harm, if their ego grew to become into harm right it somewhat is a tip. strengthen thicker epidermis, artwork harder and teach me incorrect. yet there should not be a double wide-unfold. If calling Bush a terrorist is permitted, then calling Obama one is the two allowed. that's what genuine loose speech and equality is all approximately. Obama and Bush are great sufficient adult adult males to allow it bypass, their emotions are not harm.
2016-11-26 01:45:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think free speech is great. I am proud that I have that right. What is she going to do? Do you have any proof to back such and accusation?
2007-01-03 13:12:06 · answer #5 · answered by Laura L. 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Need details. Your question sounds interpretive.
2007-01-03 13:05:15 · answer #6 · answered by Joe D 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is very scary. Another reason why we should use our rights. If we don't use them, stand up for them, educate ourselves about them... we run the risk of losing them. Our freedom of speech is crucial to our overall freedom in the U.S.
2007-01-03 13:05:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
i agree with free speach that way the truth can get out to
2007-01-03 13:04:54 · answer #8 · answered by Nightchild 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I am all for it too bad it is not allowed in America
2007-01-03 13:10:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I support all forms of Free Speach
Proof of your claim please?
2007-01-03 13:05:25 · answer #10 · answered by Ethernaut 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋