Here is what the factory states them as being:
2006 Subaru WRX STI
0-60 time 4.5 seconds
Quarter Mile 13.0 seconds with a manual tranny
--------------------------------------------------------------
2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX MR
0-60 time 4.5 seconds
Quarter Mile 13.3 seconds with a manual tranny
2007-01-03 13:14:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by radiohead5953 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are a lot of cars faster than the evo and STI, do you have a price-range for comparing? If you're talking about similar price range, I don't think there are any cars faster... perhaps the mustang cobra? but i think that's a bit more expensive. Anyway, from experience, the evo 9 does feel a lot more crisp at handling but the STI feels to accelerate faster in the straight line, due to its larger displacement and more HP/TQ
2007-01-06 07:44:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by John Y 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
STI----300 BHP
EVO 9--286 BHP
You can look up the Mitubishi's and Subaru's sites for acceleration stats.
2007-01-06 20:23:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jonathan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that EVO 9 is faster than Subaru.
2007-01-04 13:16:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by back_shark 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The STI is slightly faster, but the EVO handles way better.
2007-01-05 00:19:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
2004 R34 GT-R N1 V-spec II
or
JZA80 Rz
2007-01-03 21:12:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
My 3000gt would do both of you.
2007-01-05 12:56:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by 3000gthottie 3
·
0⤊
1⤋